aiqbench analysis
This research provides the first systematic mapping of Gromov Hyperbolicity within LLM hidden states, revealing that hierarchical tree-like structures are primarily driven by layer depth rather than parameter scale. By analyzing over 800,000 measurements across ten models, the study establishes a practical diagnostic for identifying where and how specialization alters internal distance geometry in large language models.
A Hyperbolicity Atlas of Large Language Model Hidden States
arXiv:2609.07053v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM hidden states are ordinary vectors, but the distances among those vectors may still show hierarchical structure. To our knowledge, this paper is the first systematic study of whether prompt-token hidden states in contemporary LLMs exhibit Gromov Hyperbolicity (GH), a distance-based measure of tree-likeness. Using 818,904 sample-layer measurements from ten open-weight models across MATH500, HumanEval, WinoGrande, and TruthfulQA, we build a GH map over four axes: parameter scale, layer depth, model family, and input domain. The clearest pattern is depth, not scale: middle layers usually form a high-relative-hyperbolicity plateau, while final layers often become substantially more tree-like. Scale effects are weak and non-monotonic, matched 7/8B model families differ strongly, and domains interact with model specialization. These findings make GH useful as a practical diagnostic: it shows where hierarchical distance structure appears, how specialization changes it, and which model-layer-domain comparisons deserve closer analysis.
Abstract:LLM hidden states are ordinary vectors, but the distances among those vectors may still show hierarchical structure. To our knowledge, this paper is the first systematic study of whether prompt-token hidden states in contemporary LLMs exhibit Gromov Hyperbolicity (GH), a distance-based measure of tree-likeness. Using 818,904 sample-layer measurements from ten open-weight models across MATH500, HumanEval, WinoGrande, and TruthfulQA, we build a GH map over four axes: parameter scale, layer depth, model family, and input domain. The clearest pattern is depth, not scale: middle layers usually form a high-relative-hyperbolicity plateau, while final layers often become substantially more tree-like. Scale effects are weak and non-monotonic, matched 7/8B model families differ strongly, and domains interact with model specialization. These findings make GH useful as a practical diagnostic: it shows where hierarchical distance structure appears, how specialization changes it, and which model-layer-domain comparisons deserve closer analysis.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.07053 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.07053v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.07053 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 237 words
Related coverage
Hesitation Has a Geometry: Entropy-Trained Hyperbolic Probes for Sparse Activation Steering
arXiv · Oct 5, 2026
P(Anyone Builds It & Everyone Dies) = 0.62?
LessWrong · Oct 16, 2026
ATLAS: Verifier-Guided Adaptive Latent Activation Steering for Efficient LLM Reasoning
arXiv · Jun 9, 2026
ATLAS: Verifier-Guided Adaptive Latent Activation Steering for Efficient LLM Reasoning
arXiv · Jun 10, 2026