aiqbench analysis
This study applies a spatiotemporal graph neural network to address latency issues in satellite fire observations, successfully predicting global biomass-burning radiative power up to seven days ahead. By integrating meteorological and land-cover data with recent fire history, the model reduces prediction error by over 30% compared to persistence methods, offering tangible improvements for air-quality forecasting. While detection of large fires is reliable, the approach highlights remaining calibration challenges regarding fire intensity and small-fire placement before full operational deployment.
A Graph Neural Network for Global Daily Fire Radiative Power Prediction at Medium-Range Lead Times
arXiv:2610.11022v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Skillful prediction of biomass-burning activity several days in advance is important for air-quality forecasting and aerosol prediction. Two operational constraints motivate this work. First, the GBBEPx satellite fire radiative power (FRP) product used to initialize NOAA's GEFS-Aerosols is available with about a 1.5-day latency, so each forecast cycle relies on the most recently available, but already outdated, fire observations. Second, these fire inputs are then held fixed throughout the subsequent 5-day operational forecast, or 7 days in the GSL experimental system, effectively assuming no evolution in fire activity. We develop a data-driven model that predicts global FRP one to seven days ahead from the most recent available observations. The model adapts a spatiotemporal graph neural network using reanalysis meteorology, land-cover and vegetation information, recent fire history, and GBBEPx FRP as the training target. It is trained on 2020-2022 data and evaluated for 2023-2024. The model reproduces the global seasonal cycle and substantially outperforms persistence. At 0.1$^\circ$ resolution, mean squared error is reduced by 32% at one-day lead and 43% at seven days in 2023, and by 24% and 40% in 2024. At 1$^\circ$ resolution, the critical success index ranges from 0.32 to 0.60. Detection skill declines only modestly with lead time, whereas intensity skill degrades more rapidly. Large fires are detected reliably, but their radiative power is systematically underestimated. These results demonstrate useful predictability of fire activity several days ahead and identify intensity calibration and small-fire placement as the main remaining challenges before predicted FRP can support operational aerosol forecasts.
Abstract:Skillful prediction of biomass-burning activity several days in advance is important for air-quality forecasting and aerosol prediction. Two operational constraints motivate this work. First, the GBBEPx satellite fire radiative power (FRP) product used to initialize NOAA's GEFS-Aerosols is available with about a 1.5-day latency, so each forecast cycle relies on the most recently available, but already outdated, fire observations. Second, these fire inputs are then held fixed throughout the subsequent 5-day operational forecast, or 7 days in the GSL experimental system, effectively assuming no evolution in fire activity. We develop a data-driven model that predicts global FRP one to seven days ahead from the most recent available observations. The model adapts a spatiotemporal graph neural network using reanalysis meteorology, land-cover and vegetation information, recent fire history, and GBBEPx FRP as the training target. It is trained on 2020-2022 data and evaluated for 2023-2024. The model reproduces the global seasonal cycle and substantially outperforms persistence. At 0.1$^\circ$ resolution, mean squared error is reduced by 32% at one-day lead and 43% at seven days in 2023, and by 24% and 40% in 2024. At 1$^\circ$ resolution, the critical success index ranges from 0.32 to 0.60. Detection skill declines only modestly with lead time, whereas intensity skill degrades more rapidly. Large fires are detected reliably, but their radiative power is systematically underestimated. These results demonstrate useful predictability of fire activity several days ahead and identify intensity calibration and small-fire placement as the main remaining challenges before predicted FRP can support operational aerosol forecasts.
Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics (physics.ao-ph); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.11022 [physics.ao-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.11022v1 [physics.ao-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.11022 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 349 words
