A Global Comparison of Schemas, Transparency, and Interoperability in Public-Sector AI Registers and Inventories

Abstract:Artificial intelligence (AI) registers and inventories aim to make governmental AI visible, but their institutional scope, schemas, and reporting practices construct different representations of public-sector AI. We compare 8,368 records from country-specific and transnational inventories covering 72 countries. Across 23 harmonized fields, registers shared a descriptive core but rarely requested information about appeals, risks, legal bases, or external evaluation. We found that broad schemas often contained substantial missingness, schema similarity showed no significant patterned convergence, and multiple sources covering the same jurisdictions overlapped only selectively. Based on these findings, we synthesize a layered visibility framework that shows how register records reflect disclosure arrangements and why interoperability requires shared concepts, clear definitions, and preserved provenance.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)

arXiv:2609.24883 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.24883v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.24883 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

https://doi.org/10.1145/3847238.3849037 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.