Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces a novel first-order learning algorithm for online resource allocation that achieves constant regret without relying on linear programming or nondegeneracy assumptions. By performing direct gradient ascent updates, the method offers a computationally efficient alternative for optimizing dynamic resource constraints in unknown stochastic environments.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

A First-Order Learning Algorithm for Online Resource Allocation with Constant Regret

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.05895v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study a finite-horizon online resource allocation problem with initial resource capacities proportional to the horizon. In each period, a request type is observed and one action is chosen from a finite menu. Each action earns a reward and consumes a vector of resources. The arrival types are independent and identically distributed, but their probabilities are unknown. We present a primal first-order learning policy that, in each period, performs one gradient ascent update of the action coordinates associated with the current request type. The policy achieves $O(1)$ expected additive regret relative to the hindsight optimum, with a bound independent of the horizon $T$. It does not solve any linear program, and the regret bound does not require a nondegeneracy assumption on the fluid linear program.

Abstract:We study a finite-horizon online resource allocation problem with initial resource capacities proportional to the horizon. In each period, a request type is observed and one action is chosen from a finite menu. Each action earns a reward and consumes a vector of resources. The arrival types are independent and identically distributed, but their probabilities are unknown. We present a primal first-order learning policy that, in each period, performs one gradient ascent update of the action coordinates associated with the current request type. The policy achieves $O(1)$ expected additive regret relative to the hindsight optimum, with a bound independent of the horizon $T$. It does not solve any linear program, and the regret bound does not require a nondegeneracy assumption on the fluid linear program.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.05895 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.05895v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05895 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 219 words

Related coverage