aiqbench analysis
This paper proposes a foundational reinterpretation of quantum mechanics, arguing that the standard Hilbert-space formalism is merely a specific instance of Markovian embeddings within an "indivisible" stochastic process framework. By demoting wave functions from ontological status to mathematical tools required for consistency, the author addresses the fundamental necessity of complex numbers in quantum theory without introducing new hardware or empirical anomalies.
A Deflationary Account of Quantum Theory and its Implications for the Complex Numbers
arXiv:2602.01043v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Why does quantum theory need the complex numbers? With a view toward answering this question, I argue that the usual Hilbert-space formalism is a special case of the general method of Markovian embeddings. I then describe the `indivisible interpretation' of quantum theory, according to which a quantum system can be regarded as an `indivisible' stochastic process unfolding in an old-fashioned configuration space, with wave functions and other exotic Hilbert-space ingredients demoted from having an ontological status. The complex numbers end up being necessary to ensure that the Hilbert-space formalism is indeed a Markovian embedding.
Abstract:Why does quantum theory need the complex numbers? With a view toward answering this question, I argue that the usual Hilbert-space formalism is a special case of the general method of Markovian embeddings. I then describe the `indivisible interpretation' of quantum theory, according to which a quantum system can be regarded as an `indivisible' stochastic process unfolding in an old-fashioned configuration space, with wave functions and other exotic Hilbert-space ingredients demoted from having an ontological status. The complex numbers end up being necessary to ensure that the Hilbert-space formalism is indeed a Markovian embedding.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
arXiv:2602.01043 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2602.01043v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.01043 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2026.10245 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 202 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026

Cognition GPU lattice siever factors RSA-260 at 10x lower cost
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 22, 2026

Quantum agents can reason consistently, new framework shows
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 10, 2026

Truncation errors in quantum simulations now more predictable
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 24, 2026