Off-topic for aiqbench
This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.
A Constructive Definition of Space via Dynamical Evolution and Observational Acts
arXiv:2505.09838v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We propose a constructive and dynamical redefinition of spatial structure, grounded in the interplay between mechanical evolution and observational acts. Rather than presupposing space as a static background, we interpret space as an emergent entity that arises through observational acts. Given a time evolution and a physically specified measurement context, we construct a reachability structure and a context-dependent measurable structure. Using the framework of pre-topologies, measurable structures, and the GNS construction, we analyze how the choice of observables and the system's time evolution dynamically determine the topological and measure-theoretic features of space. Time evolution and the measurement context are inputs to this construction. Deriving time itself or a complete dynamics for the selection and stabilization of the measurement context lies outside the scope of this paper. This approach highlights the observer-dependent and context-sensitive nature of spatial concepts in both classical and quantum domains.
Abstract:We propose a constructive and dynamical redefinition of spatial structure, grounded in the interplay between mechanical evolution and observational acts. Rather than presupposing space as a static background, we interpret space as an emergent entity that arises through observational acts. Given a time evolution and a physically specified measurement context, we construct a reachability structure and a context-dependent measurable structure. Using the framework of pre-topologies, measurable structures, and the GNS construction, we analyze how the choice of observables and the system's time evolution dynamically determine the topological and measure-theoretic features of space. Time evolution and the measurement context are inputs to this construction. Deriving time itself or a complete dynamics for the selection and stabilization of the measurement context lies outside the scope of this paper. This approach highlights the observer-dependent and context-sensitive nature of spatial concepts in both classical and quantum domains.
32 pages, Clarified notation in Sec. 2.1, added discussion on point-less geometry in noncommutative geometry, and included remarks on phase-space-first perspectives in quantum gravity. v3. Revised after peer review. Accepted for publication in Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science, Vol. 37 (2028)
arXiv:2505.09838 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2505.09838v3 [quant-ph] for this version)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 196 words
Related coverage

Koopman Theory and Metaethics
LessWrong · Sep 19, 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

Ergodicity broken in quantum systems even after long evolution
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 11, 2026

Agentic Systems: A Practitioner's Guide to 6 Advanced Architectural Patterns
Towards Data Science · Oct 11, 2026