Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces LOCALIZE, a configuration-first framework designed to streamline reproducible machine learning experiments specifically for radio-localization tasks. By automating workflow orchestration and versioning through human-readable files, it significantly reduces the codebase edits required when adapting models compared to traditional Jupyter notebook or Kedro approaches. The study demonstrates that this structured method maintains comparable computational efficiency while enhancing experimental rigor in ML-driven critical applications.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

A Configuration-First Framework for Reproducible, Low-Code Localization

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2510.25692v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As machine learning (ML) increasingly underpins critical applications, credible, comparable, and repeatable experimental results become more important. Everyday workflows should make rigorous experiment specification and controlled execution the default while allowing advanced experimentation when required. In practice, researchers still have to combine tools for configuration, execution, versioning, and evaluation, and repeat common implementation work within their application domain. In this paper, we present a configuration-first design for application-specific ML experimentation frameworks and implement it as LOCALIZE for radio-localization research. Experiments are declared in human-readable configuration files, a workflow orchestrator executes isolated stages with explicit inputs and outputs, and code, data, configurations, environment specifications, and generated artifacts are versioned. LOCALIZE provides preconfigured datasets, processing stages, model-development procedures, and experiment templates while retaining access to the underlying pipeline. Through a qualitative comparison and controlled quantitative studies comparing LOCALIZE with corresponding Jupyter notebook and Kedro implementations, we show that, within the studied localization workflows, LOCALIZE requires fewer codebase edits for changes supported by its localization-specific functionality, while total wall-clock time and peak memory usage remain comparable. In a controlled scaling experiment covering 1x, 5x, and 10x the base dataset volume, we observed sublinear growth in total CPU and wall time over the tested sizes.

Abstract:As machine learning (ML) increasingly underpins critical applications, credible, comparable, and repeatable experimental results become more important. Everyday workflows should make rigorous experiment specification and controlled execution the default while allowing advanced experimentation when required. In practice, researchers still have to combine tools for configuration, execution, versioning, and evaluation, and repeat common implementation work within their application domain. In this paper, we present a configuration-first design for application-specific ML experimentation frameworks and implement it as LOCALIZE for radio-localization research. Experiments are declared in human-readable configuration files, a workflow orchestrator executes isolated stages with explicit inputs and outputs, and code, data, configurations, environment specifications, and generated artifacts are versioned. LOCALIZE provides preconfigured datasets, processing stages, model-development procedures, and experiment templates while retaining access to the underlying pipeline. Through a qualitative comparison and controlled quantitative studies comparing LOCALIZE with corresponding Jupyter notebook and Kedro implementations, we show that, within the studied localization workflows, LOCALIZE requires fewer codebase edits for changes supported by its localization-specific functionality, while total wall-clock time and peak memory usage remain comparable. In a controlled scaling experiment covering 1x, 5x, and 10x the base dataset volume, we observed sublinear growth in total CPU and wall time over the tested sizes.

Software Engineering (cs.SE); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2510.25692 [cs.SE]

(or arXiv:2510.25692v4 [cs.SE] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.25692 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 296 words

Related coverage