Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This study provides a rigorous benchmark of modern text-to-speech systems specifically addressing the challenges of morphologically rich, lower-resource languages like Turkish. By evaluating four contemporary models against natural speech using eighteen objective metrics, the research offers critical insights into speaker cloning, fine-tuning efficacy, and long-form temporal consistency in non-English contexts. The released evaluation code supports reproducible analysis for researchers focusing on TTS capabilities beyond dominant Western languages.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

A Comprehensive Objective Evaluation of Modern Text-to-Speech for Turkish Using Speech Quality Assessment Models

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.06057v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern text-to-speech (TTS) systems can clone a target speaker from a short reference clip or be fine-tuned on a target voice, yet their behaviour on morphologically rich, lower-resource languages such as Turkish remain under-characterised. We present a systematic benchmark of four contemporary systems (Chatterbox, CosyVoice, OmniVoice, and VoxCPM2) evaluated across fine-tuned and zero-shot configurations, contrasted with a conventional VITS baseline and anchored to natural gold speech. Each configuration is scored with eighteen complementary objective metrics spanning learned naturalness predictors (UTMOS v2, DNSMOS-Pro, SCOREQ, WhisQA, AudioBox-PQ, NatScore, SpeechLMScore), intelligibility and signal-quality estimators (SQUIM PESQ/SI-SDR/STOI, Brouhaha), speaker similarity, distributional fidelity (TTSDS) and low-level acoustic descriptors. We further analyse how quality varies with utterance length and quantify long-form temporal consistency through speaker-identity and naturalness drift over chunked utterances. We release our evaluation code to support reproducible TTS evaluation.

Abstract:Modern text-to-speech (TTS) systems can clone a target speaker from a short reference clip or be fine-tuned on a target voice, yet their behaviour on morphologically rich, lower-resource languages such as Turkish remain under-characterised. We present a systematic benchmark of four contemporary systems (Chatterbox, CosyVoice, OmniVoice, and VoxCPM2) evaluated across fine-tuned and zero-shot configurations, contrasted with a conventional VITS baseline and anchored to natural gold speech. Each configuration is scored with eighteen complementary objective metrics spanning learned naturalness predictors (UTMOS v2, DNSMOS-Pro, SCOREQ, WhisQA, AudioBox-PQ, NatScore, SpeechLMScore), intelligibility and signal-quality estimators (SQUIM PESQ/SI-SDR/STOI, Brouhaha), speaker similarity, distributional fidelity (TTSDS) and low-level acoustic descriptors. We further analyse how quality varies with utterance length and quantify long-form temporal consistency through speaker-identity and naturalness drift over chunked utterances. We release our evaluation code to support reproducible TTS evaluation.

Accepted at 28th International Conference on Speech and Computer (SPECOM 2026). Published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Sound (cs.SD); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.06057 [cs.SD]

(or arXiv:2610.06057v1 [cs.SD] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06057 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-37867-5_31 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 259 words

Related coverage