Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This study demonstrates that inference-time augmentation (ITA) significantly boosts the robustness of PPG-based atrial fibrillation detection against noise and motion artifacts without requiring model retraining. By optimizing 13 diverse augmentation methods via Bayesian optimization, the framework achieves substantial gains in AUROC and AUPRC across multiple architectures, validating its utility for real-world deployment where training data updates are impractical. The approach offers a practical, model-agnostic solution for enhancing reliability in physiological signal classification tasks.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

A Comprehensive Inference-Time Augmentation Framework in Physiological Signals: Application to PPG-Based AF Detection

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2606.10410v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Objective: Accurate classification of physiological signals in real-world deployments is challenged by sensor noise, motion artifacts, and distribution shifts between training and deployment data. Inference-time augmentation (ITA), which applies augmentations during inference rather than retraining, offers a simple, model-agnostic mechanism to improve robustness. However, ITA application to physiological signals has remained narrow in scope, relying on limited augmentation methods with fixed, unoptimized parameters. This work proposes a unified ITA framework to address that gap. Approach: The framework incorporates 13 augmentation methods spanning time-domain, amplitude-domain, frequency-domain, and artifact-injection transformations, with hyperparameters optimized via Bayesian optimization. We evaluate on atrial fibrillation (AF) detection from 30-second PPG signals using GPT-PPG and ResNet across five datasets comprising more than 400 patients and ${\sim}$9,800 hours of recording. Main results: Standard ITA consistently improved AUROC (up to 8.5% for GPT-PPG and 0.7% for ResNet) and AUPRC (up to 10.6% for GPT-PPG and 0.8% for ResNet). Selective ITA further reduced average FPR by up to 4.4% (GPT-PPG) and 1.3% (ResNet) on non-AF datasets. Significance: These findings establish ITA as a practical, model-agnostic approach for improving PPG-based AF classification reliability in deployment settings where retraining is not feasible, with broader applicability to physiological signal analysis.

Abstract:Objective: Accurate classification of physiological signals in real-world deployments is challenged by sensor noise, motion artifacts, and distribution shifts between training and deployment data. Inference-time augmentation (ITA), which applies augmentations during inference rather than retraining, offers a simple, model-agnostic mechanism to improve robustness. However, ITA application to physiological signals has remained narrow in scope, relying on limited augmentation methods with fixed, unoptimized parameters. This work proposes a unified ITA framework to address that gap. Approach: The framework incorporates 13 augmentation methods spanning time-domain, amplitude-domain, frequency-domain, and artifact-injection transformations, with hyperparameters optimized via Bayesian optimization. We evaluate on atrial fibrillation (AF) detection from 30-second PPG signals using GPT-PPG and ResNet across five datasets comprising more than 400 patients and ${\sim}$9,800 hours of recording. Main results: Standard ITA consistently improved AUROC (up to 8.5% for GPT-PPG and 0.7% for ResNet) and AUPRC (up to 10.6% for GPT-PPG and 0.8% for ResNet). Selective ITA further reduced average FPR by up to 4.4% (GPT-PPG) and 1.3% (ResNet) on non-AF datasets. Significance: These findings establish ITA as a practical, model-agnostic approach for improving PPG-based AF classification reliability in deployment settings where retraining is not feasible, with broader applicability to physiological signal analysis.

22 pages, 11 figures, 4 tables. Under review at Physiological Measurement

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Signal Processing (eess.SP); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)

arXiv:2606.10410 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2606.10410v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.10410 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 308 words

Related coverage