aiqbench analysis
This arXiv preprint evaluates various convolutional neural network architectures, such as ResNet and VGG, for classifying COVID-19 in CT and X-ray imagery, achieving high accuracy rates. While the study demonstrates competitive performance in a specific medical imaging context, it remains an unpeer-reviewed research draft that should not be treated as established clinical fact. The work contributes to the broader field of computer vision applications in healthcare but lacks the rigorous validation required for immediate deployment or news reporting.
A Comprehensive Comparison of Deep Learning Architectures for COVID-19 Classification on CT & X-ray Imagery
arXiv:2605.20445v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: COVID-19 was a significant challenge that led to the loss of numerous lives daily. Not only a certain country was involved in this outbreak, but even the world has suffered because of the coronavirus. Imaging techniques using computed tomography (CT) and X-rays of the lungs are the most useful tools for the COVID-19 or any other pandemic disease screening process. Technology today has revolutionized the world by using artificial intelligence to replace manual processes with automated machines, which enable the system to imitate the human brain by making wise decisions based on experience. Motivated by this, our work proposes to use convolutional neural networks (CNN) based models for designing a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system that differentiates between COVID-19 and healthy lung pictures. We used two different sets of X-ray images of the lungs in addition to two different sets of CT scans and the classification is done using a variety of networks that have been pre-trained such as VGG (16, 19), Densenet (121), Resnet (50, 50 V2, 101 V2), Mobile net (V2), Xception Inception (V3, Resnet V2), Efficient net (B0) and Nasnet (Large). On the X-ray and CT image datasets, Resnet and VGG architecture have shown the ability to properly differentiate COVID-19 from normal images, with an average accuracy of 95 to 98 percent respectively. Our acquired results on the classification datasets are competitive and superior to previously reported findings in the literature.
Important: e-prints posted on arXiv are not peer-reviewed by arXiv; they should not be relied upon without context to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information without consulting multiple experts in the field.
Abstract:COVID-19 was a significant challenge that led to the loss of numerous lives daily. Not only a certain country was involved in this outbreak, but even the world has suffered because of the coronavirus. Imaging techniques using computed tomography (CT) and X-rays of the lungs are the most useful tools for the COVID-19 or any other pandemic disease screening process. Technology today has revolutionized the world by using artificial intelligence to replace manual processes with automated machines, which enable the system to imitate the human brain by making wise decisions based on experience. Motivated by this, our work proposes to use convolutional neural networks (CNN) based models for designing a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system that differentiates between COVID-19 and healthy lung pictures. We used two different sets of X-ray images of the lungs in addition to two different sets of CT scans and the classification is done using a variety of networks that have been pre-trained such as VGG (16, 19), Densenet (121), Resnet (50, 50 V2, 101 V2), Mobile net (V2), Xception Inception (V3, Resnet V2), Efficient net (B0) and Nasnet (Large). On the X-ray and CT image datasets, Resnet and VGG architecture have shown the ability to properly differentiate COVID-19 from normal images, with an average accuracy of 95 to 98 percent respectively. Our acquired results on the classification datasets are competitive and superior to previously reported findings in the literature.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
I.2.10; I.4.9; J.3
arXiv:2605.20445 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2605.20445v2 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20445 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 377 words
Related coverage
Comprehensive Benchmarking of Deep Learning Architectures for Lung Cancer Histopathology
arXiv · Aug 18, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026
Pixel Wised Lesion Prediction on COVID-19 CT Imagery: A Comparative Analysis of Automated Image Segmentation Architectures
arXiv · Aug 28, 2026
Do emulated quantum circuits change what CNNs look at? Performance and explainability comparison in medical image classification
arXiv · Jul 28, 2026