aiqbench analysis
This study provides a rigorous comparison of CNN backbones for partial face recognition, demonstrating that FaceNet significantly outperforms ResNet-50 and VGG-16 under strict transfer learning constraints on the SoF dataset. By freezing the backbone and optimizing only the head, the research offers a practical, reproducible baseline for improving surveillance and forensic accuracy in occluded scenarios. The findings are highly relevant for engineers developing robust computer vision models where partial facial data is common.
A Comparative Transfer-Learning Study of CNN Backbones for Partial Face Recognition on the SoF Dataset
arXiv:2609.31677v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Face recognition is widely deployed in surveillance, access control, and forensic workflows, yet accuracy degrades sharply once the face is occluded by accessories, foreground objects, or the frame edge. Because most faces in the wild are partial, robust partial face recognition (PFR) remains open. This paper compares three pretrained convolutional backbones, ResNet-50, VGG-16, and FaceNet, fine-tuned for PFR by transfer learning under identical preprocessing, splitting, and optimization protocols on the Specs-on-Faces (SoF) dataset. All three arms use a common 160x160 input and a frozen backbone with a trainable head under a fixed epoch budget and no per-backbone hyperparameter search. The FaceNet configuration, denoted PFN (Partial FaceNet), substantially outperforms the other two, reaching 97.4% test accuracy with macro-averaged 87.04% precision, 84.61% recall, and 84.17% F1 over the 112 identity classes, the highest accuracy and recall reported on SoF.
Abstract:Face recognition is widely deployed in surveillance, access control, and forensic workflows, yet accuracy degrades sharply once the face is occluded by accessories, foreground objects, or the frame edge. Because most faces in the wild are partial, robust partial face recognition (PFR) remains open. This paper compares three pretrained convolutional backbones, ResNet-50, VGG-16, and FaceNet, fine-tuned for PFR by transfer learning under identical preprocessing, splitting, and optimization protocols on the Specs-on-Faces (SoF) dataset. All three arms use a common 160x160 input and a frozen backbone with a trainable head under a fixed epoch budget and no per-backbone hyperparameter search. The FaceNet configuration, denoted PFN (Partial FaceNet), substantially outperforms the other two, reaching 97.4% test accuracy with macro-averaged 87.04% precision, 84.61% recall, and 84.17% F1 over the 112 identity classes, the highest accuracy and recall reported on SoF.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.31677 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2609.31677v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31677 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 237 words
Related coverage

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026

GLM-5.3 Sometimes Considers How Train-Time Actions Shape Future Behavior
LessWrong · Oct 15, 2026