aiqbench analysis
This research proposes a cognitive architecture integrating Large Language Models with domain ontologies to enhance operator situational awareness and reduce workload in Remotely Operated Vehicle missions. By grounding LLM reasoning capabilities in specific underwater vehicle knowledge, the system validates mission feasibility and execution plans while comparing model performance across different operational roles. The study highlights how combining symbolic knowledge bases with generative AI can create safer, more efficient shared autonomy frameworks for complex robotics tasks.
A Cognitive Architecture for Shared Autonomy in AUV Operations
arXiv:2608.29347v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Operators remain essential to Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) operation, yet often suffer from low situational awareness and high workload, both of which negatively affect safety. This paper presents a cognitive architecture consisting of an ontology and multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) to assist the operator at all stages of the mission. Each LLM is grounded with domain-specific information from the ontology and given a simple role to create a system that can support the operator at all stages of an operation. We are aiming to prove that using the two together will allow decisions to be grounded in the relevant domain knowledge, but also benefit from the reasoning capabilities of the LLM. Our framework determines if a mission is possible for a given Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUV), performs mission planning, and executes a given mission in simulation. The operator can be involved in planning and execution, ensuring the resulting plan is valid and that the vehicle behaves safely during execution. We compare different LLMs, Llama3, GPT-OSS, and Qwen2.5, to determine which are best suited to the different roles within our framework. We find that GPT-OSS performs best for feasibility assessment, planning, and execution, while Qwen2.5 is best suited to identifying mission types from natural language input.
Abstract:Operators remain essential to Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) operation, yet often suffer from low situational awareness and high workload, both of which negatively affect safety. This paper presents a cognitive architecture consisting of an ontology and multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) to assist the operator at all stages of the mission. Each LLM is grounded with domain-specific information from the ontology and given a simple role to create a system that can support the operator at all stages of an operation. We are aiming to prove that using the two together will allow decisions to be grounded in the relevant domain knowledge, but also benefit from the reasoning capabilities of the LLM. Our framework determines if a mission is possible for a given Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUV), performs mission planning, and executes a given mission in simulation. The operator can be involved in planning and execution, ensuring the resulting plan is valid and that the vehicle behaves safely during execution. We compare different LLMs, Llama3, GPT-OSS, and Qwen2.5, to determine which are best suited to the different roles within our framework. We find that GPT-OSS performs best for feasibility assessment, planning, and execution, while Qwen2.5 is best suited to identifying mission types from natural language input.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2608.29347 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2608.29347v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.29347 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 299 words
Related coverage
Assessing Information Ecosystems : How Governments Can Get Ahead of Hybrid Threats
carnegieendowment.org · Aug 5, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026

Presentation: Platform Teams Enabling AI - MCP/Multi-Agentic Tools across Linkedin
InfoQ · Jun 5, 2026
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026