aiqbench analysis
This study evaluates a two-tier architecture that uses lightweight local models to triage diabetic retinopathy cases before sending only high-priority images to cloud-based heavyweights. The approach significantly reduces data transfer and computational costs while maintaining clinically relevant sensitivity, though it introduces a slight trade-off in overall accuracy compared to pure cloud inference. This work highlights practical deployment strategies for medical AI where connectivity or bandwidth is limited.
A Cascaded Edge-Cloud Architecture for Automated Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
arXiv:2605.14108v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of preventable blindness, and automated screening can help extend specialist capacity in resource-constrained clinical workflows. Cloud-based deep learning systems can provide strong grading performance, but they require image upload and reliable connectivity. We evaluate a two-tier edge-cloud cascade on the public APTOS 2019 Blindness Detection dataset. Tier 1 runs a lightweight MobileNetV3-small model locally to triage Referable DR (Classes 2-4) versus Non-referable DR (Classes 0-1). Tier 2 runs a RETFound-DINOv2 model in the cloud for ordinal severity grading only on images flagged as referable by Tier 1. On a stratified APTOS test split of 733 images, Tier 1 reaches 98.99% sensitivity and 84.37% specificity at a validation-tuned high-sensitivity threshold. The deployment-oriented safety-floor cascade forwards 49.52% of test images to Tier 2, reducing image-count cloud calls by 50.48% relative to a cloud-only model. In the deployed 4-class output space (Class 0-1 / Class 2 / Class 3 / Class 4), the safety-floor cascade obtains 77.49% accuracy and 0.7938 quadratic weighted kappa, while the cloud-only baseline obtains 80.76% accuracy and 0.8184 kappa. A Tier-2-override comparator improves accuracy to 80.49% and kappa to 0.8167, but downgrades 12 true referable cases after Tier 1 correctly forwarded them. We also report repeated stratified bootstrap variability, a prevalence-dependent cloud-call curve, raw-byte upload estimates, and CPU latency for the local tier. Index Terms: Diabetic retinopathy screening, retinal image analysis, edge-cloud computing, cascaded inference, teleophthalmology, clinical decision support, medical artificial intelligence, resource-constrained healthcare
Abstract:Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of preventable blindness, and automated screening can help extend specialist capacity in resource-constrained clinical workflows. Cloud-based deep learning systems can provide strong grading performance, but they require image upload and reliable connectivity. We evaluate a two-tier edge-cloud cascade on the public APTOS 2019 Blindness Detection dataset. Tier 1 runs a lightweight MobileNetV3-small model locally to triage Referable DR (Classes 2-4) versus Non-referable DR (Classes 0-1). Tier 2 runs a RETFound-DINOv2 model in the cloud for ordinal severity grading only on images flagged as referable by Tier 1. On a stratified APTOS test split of 733 images, Tier 1 reaches 98.99% sensitivity and 84.37% specificity at a validation-tuned high-sensitivity threshold. The deployment-oriented safety-floor cascade forwards 49.52% of test images to Tier 2, reducing image-count cloud calls by 50.48% relative to a cloud-only model. In the deployed 4-class output space (Class 0-1 / Class 2 / Class 3 / Class 4), the safety-floor cascade obtains 77.49% accuracy and 0.7938 quadratic weighted kappa, while the cloud-only baseline obtains 80.76% accuracy and 0.8184 kappa. A Tier-2-override comparator improves accuracy to 80.49% and kappa to 0.8167, but downgrades 12 true referable cases after Tier 1 correctly forwarded them. We also report repeated stratified bootstrap variability, a prevalence-dependent cloud-call curve, raw-byte upload estimates, and CPU latency for the local tier. Index Terms: Diabetic retinopathy screening, retinal image analysis, edge-cloud computing, cascaded inference, teleophthalmology, clinical decision support, medical artificial intelligence, resource-constrained healthcare
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2605.14108 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2605.14108v2 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.14108 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 345 words
Related coverage
Assessing Information Ecosystems : How Governments Can Get Ahead of Hybrid Threats
carnegieendowment.org · Aug 5, 2026

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · May 21, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026