aiqbench analysis
This study demonstrates that rubric-guided playbook induction can enable a general-purpose LLM to outperform human audiologists in simulated consultations without fine-tuning the model backbone. By leveraging multimodal audiogram interpretation and retrieval-augmented grounding, the system achieved superior results across both English and Chinese cases, highlighting a viable pathway for deploying specialist AI agents in data-scarce medical domains.
A bilingual AI audiologist built through rubric-guided playbook induction outperforms human audiologists in a blinded evaluation of simulated cases
arXiv:2609.32220v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Audiology consultation requires structured history-taking, audiometric interpretation and patient-centred communication, yet real-world case material is scarce. We present a bilingual AI audiologist pairing a general-purpose large language model with rubric-guided playbook induction, multimodal audiogram interpretation and retrieval-augmented grounding, without fine-tuning the language-model backbone. Using a 21-item rubric and an AI patient simulator, we induced a 19-rule consultation policy from 73 training cases (43 English, 30 Chinese) and evaluated the system on 58 independent simulated cases (30 Chinese, 28 English) in a pre-specified, source-blinded comparison with 17 practising audiologists. The AI audiologist outperformed human audiologists on every case (58/58; mean paired $\Delta$ = +1.35 on a 5-point composite, Cohen's d = 1.84, $P = 4.5 \times 10^{-20}$), on 20 of 21 rubric items and in both languages. Component ablation identified the playbook as the largest contributor, offering a practical route to specialist consultation agents in low-data medical domains.
Abstract:Audiology consultation requires structured history-taking, audiometric interpretation and patient-centred communication, yet real-world case material is scarce. We present a bilingual AI audiologist pairing a general-purpose large language model with rubric-guided playbook induction, multimodal audiogram interpretation and retrieval-augmented grounding, without fine-tuning the language-model backbone. Using a 21-item rubric and an AI patient simulator, we induced a 19-rule consultation policy from 73 training cases (43 English, 30 Chinese) and evaluated the system on 58 independent simulated cases (30 Chinese, 28 English) in a pre-specified, source-blinded comparison with 17 practising audiologists. The AI audiologist outperformed human audiologists on every case (58/58; mean paired $\Delta$ = +1.35 on a 5-point composite, Cohen's d = 1.84, $P = 4.5 \times 10^{-20}$), on 20 of 21 rubric items and in both languages. Component ablation identified the playbook as the largest contributor, offering a practical route to specialist consultation agents in low-data medical domains.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.32220 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.32220v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32220 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 241 words
Related coverage

Building AI builders: Playbook for closing the AI knowledge-capability gap
AWS · Oct 7, 2026

10 Ways AI Helps You Build What Your Business Needs
AppDirect · May 15, 2026

Evaluate skill-equipped agents with Strands Evals and Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Sep 22, 2026
JuryFlow: Disagreement-Guided Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent Evaluation
arXiv · Oct 1, 2026