Skip to content

Benchmarks

Sources
18
Entries tracked
442
Last sync
4 h
All sources syncing normally
  • QED-C5 days ago
  • QAT · CVP4 hours ago
  • QAT · OE4 hours ago
  • QAT · VP4 hours ago
  • AQCE · QEC22 hours ago
  • AQCE · Errors22 hours ago
  • AQCE · Qubits22 hours ago
  • AQCE · T122 hours ago
  • IonQ fleet6 hours ago
  • Wikipedia · Processors22 hours ago
  • Wikipedia · QV22 hours ago
  • Metriq · EPLG22 hours ago
  • Metriq · BSEQ22 hours ago
  • Metriq · CLOPS22 hours ago
  • Metriq · QML22 hours ago
  • Metriq · QAOA22 hours ago
  • Metriq · WIT22 hours ago
  • Metriq · Mirror22 hours ago

Quantum · Timeline

Quantum progress, in order

Every hardware milestone, record, advantage claim, funding round and roadmap promise the site tracks, on one timeline, newest first. Read a lane down the page to see how it moves; don't read across lanes as a ranking.

Newest on the timeline

Records at a glanceLargest device in 5 lanes, logical-qubit record, funding, research volume

Largest device, per lane

Logical qubits, record

48logical qubits

QuEra 48 logical qubits · Apr 2024 · on the timeline

Funding caught, last 8 quarters

66 rounds · $16.4B in USD figures

What the news corpus caught, not the market. Only rounds with a USD figure are counted.

Research volume

2,294

arXiv quant-ph submissions in September 2026

Sources

Promised next · 9

Roadmap targets whose year has not arrived yet, at the vendor's own date. They move into the timeline when the year passes, as shipped or as past their date.

  1. RoadmapSuperconductingPromised for 2026

    IBM · Kookaburra — modular 4,158-qubit system

  2. RoadmapNeutral-atomPromised for 2026

    Atom Computing · Level-4 fault-tolerant quantum computer (with Microsoft)

  3. RoadmapTrapped-ionPromised for 2027

    Quantinuum · Sol — universal fault-tolerant machine

  4. RoadmapPromised for 2027

    PsiQuantum · 1-million-qubit photonic chip (Omega chipset)

  5. RoadmapTrapped-ionPromised for 2029

    Quantinuum · Apollo — hundreds of logical qubits

  6. RoadmapSuperconductingPromised for 2029

    IBM · Starling — 200 logical qubits, 100M gates

  7. RoadmapTrapped-ionPromised for 2030

    IonQ · AQ 1,024 (algorithmic qubits), scale-out via networking

  8. RoadmapSuperconductingPromised for 2030

    Google · Large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computer

  9. RoadmapSuperconductingPromised for 2033

    IBM · Blue Jay — 2,000 logical qubits, 1B gates

2026110 events

  1. Funding

    EMode Photonix

    $1M

    Pre-seed · Investors: Ground State Ventures, Harlow Capital Management

  2. Funding

    Unitary Quantum

    $29M

    Venture round · Investors: ICBC Capital, CMB International Capital, Beijing Financial Holdings

  3. Funding3 sources

    Diraq

    $300M

    Investors: U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)

  4. Funding2 sources

    Oratomic

    $775M

    Investors: ARCH Venture Partners, Spark Capital, Khosla Ventures +3 more

  5. Funding2 sources

    PsiQuantum

    $150M

    Debt · Investors: U.S. Department of War's Office of Strategic Capital (OSC)

  6. Funding4 sources

    Universal Quantum

    $100M

    Series A · Investors: DCVC, Firgun Ventures, EDBI +12 more

  7. Funding

    Korea Quantum Computing, Inc.

    $80M

    SPAC · Investors: Charlton Aria Acquisition Corporation

  8. Funding

    Quanfluence

    $10M

    Series A · Investors: Chiratae Ventures, Pi Ventures, Rainmatter by Zerodha

  9. FundingNeutral-atom

    Pasqal

    €50M

    Grant · Investors: EU Chips Joint Undertaking (Chips JU), National/Regional authorities

  10. Funding

    Quantum Internet Alliance

    €47.5M

    Grant · Investors: European Commission

  11. Funding

    Azulene Labs

    $3.4M

    Pre-seed · Investors: Ground State Ventures, Entrada Ventures

  12. Funding

    Qingxing Heterogeneous Computing

    ¥100M≈ $14.9M

    Series A · Investors: Jinkai Capital, Anhui High-Tech Investment, Daode Investment +4 more

  13. HardwareNeutral-atom

    Infleqtion Sqale

    80physical qubits

    30 entangled logical qubits from 80 physical — first neutral-atom company at 30 logical qubits on a commercial system.

  14. Logical qubitsNeutral-atom

    Infleqtion Sqale

    30logical qubits

    30 entangled logical qubits from 80 physical — first neutral-atom company at 30 logical qubits on a commercial system.

  15. Funding

    QUDORA Technologies

    $138.8M

    Grant · Investors: German Government, Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space (BMFTR)

  16. Funding

    QUDORA Technologies

    €122M

    NFQC-1k project proposal · Investors: Lower Saxony State Chancellery

  17. Funding

    Fortaegis

    $50M

    Series A · Investors: Serendipity Capital, TEL Venture Capital, TNO +4 more

  18. Funding

    Fortaegis Technologies

    $50M

    Series A · Investors: Serendipity Capital, TEL Venture Capital, ASML +6 more

  19. Funding

    OptQC Corp.

    $47M

    Series A2 · Investors: NTT, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric (ME Innovation Fund), KDDI +5 more

  20. Advantage claim · Classically verifiable

    Quantinuum Helios-1 recovery for peaked_circuit_P12_Hqap_98x2457

    100%score on this instance (higher is better)

    Instance peaked_circuit_P12_Hqap_98x2457 · Singapore Management University

  21. Advantage claim · Classically verifiable

    Quantinuum Helios-1 recovery for peaked_circuit_P11_Hqap_98x1999

    100%score on this instance (higher is better)

    Instance peaked_circuit_P11_Hqap_98x1999 · Singapore Management University

  22. Funding

    Falqon Systems

    €2.5M

    Investors: Ground State Ventures, Cottonwood Technology Fund, InnovationQuarter

  23. FundingTrapped-ion

    Quantinuum

    $100M

    Grant · Investors: U.S. government

    fool.com

  24. Funding3 sources

    QNu Labs

    $21M

    Series A1 · Investors: National Quantum Mission, Speciale Invest, Sony Innovation Fund +2 more

  25. Funding

    D-Wave

    $100M

    Strategic · Investors: US Department of Commerce

  26. Advantage claim · Classically verifiable

    ibm_boston_dcs_nq70_depth70_checks27

    0.3%score on this instance (higher is better)

    Instance doped_random_graph_sampling_nq70_depth70_checks27 · IBM, UChicago

  27. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    su2_hadron_MPS

    59.9985estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance su2_hadron_dynamics_lsh_x_100_meson · Caltech

  28. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    Simulating SU(2) Hadron dynamics on a 60 site lattice using 120 qubits

    60.0054estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance su2_hadron_dynamics_lsh_x_100_meson · Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani, IBM

  29. Funding

    NVision Quantum Technologies

    €293.5K

    Grant · Investors: EuroHPC Joint Undertaking

  30. Advantage claim · Variational

    [N_2] (14e, 28o) 3.0A HCI

    -108.9615energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance n2_3-00_14e_28o · Qunova Computing, RIKEN

  31. Advantage claim · Variational

    [2Fe-2S] (30e, 20o) HCI

    -116.6054energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance 2fe_2s_30e_20o · Qunova Computing, RIKEN

  32. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    QESEM (unbiased), ibm_boston, ZZd3, 51qx16c

    0.2111estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance floquet_mixed_field_ising_zzd3_51qx16c · Qedma, IBM, Riken, BlueQubit

  33. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    SPP, ORQA (eps0=5e-8, W=16), ZZd3, 51qx16c

    0.1834estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance floquet_mixed_field_ising_zzd3_51qx16c · Qedma, IBM, Riken, BlueQubit

  34. Advantage claim · Classically verifiable

    mpo_unswapping_cpu_laptop_56_1917

    100%score on this instance (higher is better)

    Instance peaked_circuit_P9_Hqap_56x1917 · Moderna

  35. HardwareTrapped-ion

    Alpine Quantum Technologies LYNX

    15physical qubits

  36. Quantum volumeTrapped-ion

    Alpine Quantum Technologies LYNX quantum computer Series

    32,768quantum volume

  37. Advantage claim · Classically verifiable

    ibm_boston_rgs_nq70_depth70_checks27_basis_fstate

    0.4%score on this instance (higher is better)

    Instance random_graph_sampling_nq70_depth70_checks27_basis_fstate · IBM, University of Chicago

  38. HardwareSuperconducting

    Rigetti Cepheus-1-108Q

    108physical qubits

    12×9-qubit chiplet architecture; 99.1% median 2Q fidelity at general availability.

  39. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    Simulating SU(2) Hadron dynamics on a 60 site lattice using 120 qubits

    59.994estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance su2_hadron_dynamics_lsh_x_100_meson · Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani, IBM

  40. Advantage claim · Variational

    ASCI solution of guided_sparse_ground_state_problem_49Q_v1

    -85.5566energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance guided_sparse_ground_state_problem_49Q_v1 · IBM, RIKEN, University of Chicago

  41. Advantage claim · Variational

    HCI solution of guided_sparse_ground_state_problem_49Q_v1

    -85.5766energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance guided_sparse_ground_state_problem_49Q_v1 · IBM, RIKEN, University of Chicago

  42. Advantage claim · Variational

    CIPSI solution of guided_sparse_ground_state_problem_49Q_v1

    -85.5766energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance guided_sparse_ground_state_problem_49Q_v1 · IBM, RIKEN, University of Chicago

  43. Advantage claim · Variational

    DMRG solution of guided_sparse_ground_state_problem_49Q_v1

    -85.5866energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance guided_sparse_ground_state_problem_49Q_v1 · IBM, RIKEN, University of Chicago

  44. Advantage claim · Variational

    TAM_for_guided_sparse_ground_state_problem_49Q_v1

    -85.5866energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance guided_sparse_ground_state_problem_49Q_v1 · IBM, RIKEN, University of Chicago

  45. Advantage claim · Variational

    SKQD_for_guided_sparse_ground_state_problem_49Q_v1

    -85.5866energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance guided_sparse_ground_state_problem_49Q_v1 · IBM, RIKEN, University of Chicago

  46. Advantage claim · Variational

    [N_2] (14e, 28o) 3.0A HI-VQE

    -108.9612energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance n2_3-00_14e_28o · Qunova Computing, RIKEN

  47. Advantage claim · Variational

    [2Fe-2S] (30e, 20o) HI-VQE

    -116.6047energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance 2fe_2s_30e_20o · Qunova Computing, RIKEN

  48. Advantage claim · Classically verifiable

    mpo_unswapping_56_1917

    100%score on this instance (higher is better)

    Instance peaked_circuit_P9_Hqap_56x1917 · IBM

  49. Advantage claim · Classically verifiable

    tno_cancellation_49x5072

    100%score on this instance (higher is better)

    Instance peaked_circuit_heavy_hex_49x5072 · IBM

  50. FundingNeutral-atom

    Infleqtion

    $528.2M

    IPO · Investors: Churchill Capital Corp X, Public Investors

  51. Funding

    Inertia

    $450M

    Series A · Investors: Bessemer Venture Partners, GV

  52. Advantage claim · Classically verifiable

    TNS + BP classical simulation for peaked_heavyhex_49_5072 circuit

    100%score on this instance (higher is better)

    Instance peaked_circuit_heavy_hex_49x5072 · BlueQubit

  53. Qubit countNeutral-atomNew record

    Trapping 11,000 Atoms in a Tweezer Array Generated by a Single Metasurface

    11,000qubits

    Not rearranged; ~11,022 Rb atoms loaded per shot across 18,225 sites (135x135), 60.5% filling, generated by a single ~2 cm metasurface outside the vacuum cell

    Paper

202540 events

  1. Advantage claim · Classically verifiable

    Quantum runtime for peaked circuit 49q x 5072 CZ's on heavy-hex

    100%score on this instance (higher is better)

    Instance peaked_circuit_heavy_hex_49x5072 · IBM

  2. Advantage claim · Classically verifiable

    Classical Solution for peaked_circuit_p9_hqap_56x1917

    100%score on this instance (higher is better)

    Instance peaked_circuit_P9_Hqap_56x1917 · BlueQubit, University of Toronto, Vector Institute

  3. Advantage claim · Classically verifiable

    Quantum Solution for peaked_circuit_p9_hqap_56x1917

    100%score on this instance (higher is better)

    Instance peaked_circuit_P9_Hqap_56x1917 · BlueQubit, University of Toronto, Vector Institute

  4. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    49x1296, ibm_pittsburgh

    0.649estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance operator_loschmidt_echo_49x1296 · IBM, Algorithmiq, Flatiron Institute

  5. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    49x1296, ibm_boston (layout 2)

    0.657estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance operator_loschmidt_echo_49x1296 · IBM, Algorithmiq, Flatiron Institute

  6. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    Single_path_MC_70x1872

    0.614estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance operator_loschmidt_echo_70x1872 · University of Chicago, IBM, Algorithmiq, EPFL, Flatiron Institute

  7. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    Single_path_MC_49x1296

    0.619estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance operator_loschmidt_echo_49x1296 · University of Chicago, IBM, Algorithmiq, EPFL, Flatiron Institute

  8. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    Single_path_MC_49x648

    0.808estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance operator_loschmidt_echo_49x648 · University of Chicago, IBM, Algorithmiq, EPFL, Flatiron Institute

  9. Advantage claim · Variational

    [4Fe-4S] (54e, 36o) CISD

    -326.7421energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance 4fe_4s_54e_36o · IBM, RIKEN

  10. Advantage claim · Variational

    [4Fe-4S] (54e, 36o) RHF

    -326.5474energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance 4fe_4s_54e_36o · IBM, RIKEN

  11. Advantage claim · Variational

    TrimCI_202511_6e7

    -327.175energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance 4fe_4s_54e_36o · University of Wisconsin - Madison

  12. Advantage claim · Variational

    TrimCI_202511_1e4

    -326.913energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance 4fe_4s_54e_36o · University of Wisconsin - Madison

  13. Advantage claim · Variational

    TrimCI_202511_1e3

    -326.81energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance 4fe_4s_54e_36o · University of Wisconsin - Madison

  14. Advantage claim · Classically verifiable

    TNO + Iterative Cancellation for peaked_circuit_heavy_hex_49x4020

    100%score on this instance (higher is better)

    Instance peaked_circuit_heavy_hex_49x4020 · IBM

  15. Advantage claim · Classically verifiable

    Quantum Runtime for peaked_circuit_heavy_hex_49x4020

    100%score on this instance (higher is better)

    Instance peaked_circuit_heavy_hex_49x4020 · IBM

  16. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    49x648, ibm_boston

    0.824estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance operator_loschmidt_echo_49x648 · IBM, Algorithmiq, Flatiron Institute

  17. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    49x1296, ibm_boston

    0.662estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance operator_loschmidt_echo_49x1296 · IBM, Algorithmiq, Flatiron Institute

  18. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    70x1872, ibm_boston

    0.673estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance operator_loschmidt_echo_70x1872 · IBM, Algorithmiq, Flatiron Institute

  19. HardwareSuperconducting

    IBM Nighthawk

    120physical qubits

    Commercial delivery: 218 tunable couplers, circuits up to ~5,000 two-qubit gates.

  20. Advantage claim · Classically verifiable

    TNS+BP for peaked_circuit_heavy_hex_49x4020

    100%score on this instance (higher is better)

    Instance peaked_circuit_heavy_hex_49x4020 · BlueQubit

  21. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    70x1872, BP-TN BD=512, rescaled

    0.9525estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance operator_loschmidt_echo_70x1872 · Algorithmiq, Flatiron Institute

  22. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    70x1872, BP-TN BD=512, no rescaling

    0.8738estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance operator_loschmidt_echo_70x1872 · Algorithmiq, Flatiron Institute

  23. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    49x1296, BP-TN BD=512, rescaled

    0.9426estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance operator_loschmidt_echo_49x1296 · Algorithmiq, Flatiron Institute

  24. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    49x1296, BP-TN BD=512, no rescaling

    0.8816estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance operator_loschmidt_echo_49x1296 · Algorithmiq, Flatiron Institute

  25. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    49x648, BP-TN BD=512, no rescaling

    0.8217estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance operator_loschmidt_echo_49x648 · Algorithmiq, Flatiron Institute

  26. Advantage claim · Observable estimation

    49x648, BP-TN BD=192, no rescaling

    0.8203estimated observable, against this instance's reference

    Instance operator_loschmidt_echo_49x648 · Algorithmiq, Flatiron Institute

  27. Advantage claim · Variational

    SQD [4Fe-4S] (54e, 36o)

    -326.913energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance 4fe_4s_54e_36o · IBM, RIKEN

  28. Advantage claim · Variational

    SKQD

    -62.2567energy in Hartree (lower is better)

    Instance anderson_impurity_model_4i_28b_32e · IBM, ORNL, University of Maryland

  29. HardwareTrapped-ionLane record

    Quantinuum Helios

    98physical qubits

    First trapped-ion device with QV=2^20; 99.921% 2Q, 99.9975% 1Q fidelity.

  30. Quantum volumeTrapped-ionNew record

    Quantinuum System Model H2-2

    33,554,432quantum volume

  31. Quantum volumeSuperconducting

    IBM Heron r3 "Pittsburgh"

    2,048quantum volume

  32. Quantum volumeSuperconducting

    IBM Heron r3 "Pittsburgh"

    1,024quantum volume

  33. HardwareTrapped-ionLane record

    IonQ Tempo

    64physical qubits· 64 algorithmic qubits (AQ, IonQ's own metric)

    Enterprise system targeting AQ 64.

  34. Quantum volumeTrapped-ionNew record

    Quantinuum System Model H2-1

    8,388,608quantum volume

  35. HardwareTopologicalLane record

    Microsoft Majorana 1

    8physical qubits

    First topological-qubit chip claimed; 8 topological qubits announced.

202417 events

  1. HardwareSuperconducting

    USTC Zuchongzhi 3.0

    105physical qubits

  2. HardwareSuperconducting

    Google Willow

    105physical qubits

    First below-threshold surface-code error correction: logical error rate falls as code distance grows.

  3. Logical qubitsSuperconducting

    Google Willow

    1logical qubit

    First below-threshold surface-code error correction: logical error rate falls as code distance grows.

  4. HardwareNeutral-atom

    Atom Computing 24 logical qubits

    256physical qubits

    24 entangled logical qubits on a neutral-atom device.

  5. Logical qubitsNeutral-atom

    Atom Computing 24 logical qubits

    24logical qubits

    24 entangled logical qubits on a neutral-atom device.

  6. HardwareSuperconducting

    IBM Heron R2

    156physical qubits

    Updated Heron with lower crosstalk and larger circuit depth.

  7. Quantum volumeTrapped-ionNew record

    Quantinuum System Model H2-1

    2,097,152quantum volume

  8. HardwarePhotonic

    Xanadu Aurora

    12physical qubits

    Modular photonic architecture demo, path to fault tolerance.

  9. HardwareNeutral-atom

    QuEra 48 logical qubits

    280physical qubits

    First >40 logical qubits demonstrated (Bluvstein et al., Nature).

    Paper

  10. Logical qubitsNeutral-atomNew record

    QuEra 48 logical qubits

    48logical qubits

    First >40 logical qubits demonstrated (Bluvstein et al., Nature).

    Paper

  11. HardwareTrapped-ionLane record

    Quantinuum H2-1

    56physical qubits

    First 56-qubit trapped-ion device; QV = 2^19.

  12. Quantum volumeTrapped-ionNew record

    Quantinuum System Model H1-1

    1,048,576quantum volume

  13. Quantum volumeSuperconducting

    IQM 20-qubit system

    32quantum volume

  14. HardwareSuperconducting

    CAS Xiaohong

    504physical qubits

  15. Qubit countNeutral-atomNew record

    A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits

    6,100qubits

    Not rearranged

    Paper

  16. Code distanceSuperconductingNew record

    Repetition Code [[29,1,29]] — Acharya 2024

    29code distance

    Google Quantum AI · Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold

    Paper

202319 events

  1. HardwareSuperconducting

    Rigetti Ankaa-2

    84physical qubits

  2. HardwareSuperconductingLane record

    IBM Condor

    1,121physical qubits

    IBM's first >1000-qubit processor.

  3. HardwareSuperconducting

    IBM Heron R1

    133physical qubits

    3–5× lower error rate than Eagle; the utility-scale successor.

  4. HardwareSuperconducting

    IBM Heron

    133physical qubits

  5. HardwareNeutral-atomLane record

    Atom Computing 1180-qubit prototype

    1,180atoms

    First >1000-atom quantum device (physical qubits).

  6. HardwareSuperconducting

    IQM 20-qubit processor

    20physical qubits

  7. Quantum volumeTrapped-ionNew record

    Quantinuum System Model H1-1

    524,288quantum volume

  8. HardwareTrapped-ionLane record

    IonQ Forte Enterprise

    36physical qubits· 35 algorithmic qubits (AQ, IonQ's own metric)

  9. Quantum volumeTrapped-ionNew record

    Quantinuum System Model H2

    65,536quantum volume

  10. HardwareSuperconducting

    Quantware Tenor

    64physical qubits

  11. HardwareSuperconducting

    Google Sycamore (upgrade)

    70physical qubits

    Random-circuit-sampling advantage extended vs classical.

    Paper

  12. Quantum volumeTrapped-ion

    Alpine Quantum Technologies Compact Ion-Trap Quantum Computing Demonstrator

    128quantum volume

  13. Quantum volumeTrapped-ionNew record

    Quantinuum System Model H1-1

    32,768quantum volume

  14. HardwareSuperconducting

    Oxford Quantum Circuits OQC Toshiko

    32physical qubits

  15. Code distanceSuperconductingNew record

    Repetition Code [[25,1,25]] — Acharya 2023

    25code distance

    Google Quantum AI · Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit

    Paper

202218 events

  1. HardwareNeutral-atomLane record

    M Squared Lasers Maxwell

    200physical qubits

  2. Quantum volumeTrapped-ionNew record

    Quantinuum System Model H1-1

    8,192quantum volume

  3. HardwareSuperconducting

    Rigetti Aspen-M-2

    80physical qubits

  4. HardwarePhotonicLane record

    Xanadu Borealis

    216physical qubits

    216-mode programmable Gaussian boson sampler.

  5. HardwareTrapped-ionLane record

    IonQ Forte

    32physical qubits· 29 algorithmic qubits (AQ, IonQ's own metric)

    First software-configurable ion-trap system; AQ 29.

  6. Quantum volumeSuperconducting

    IBM Falcon r10 "Prague"

    512quantum volume

  7. Quantum volumeSuperconducting

    IBM Falcon r10 "Prague"

    256quantum volume

  8. Quantum volumeTrapped-ionNew record

    Quantinuum System Model H1-2

    4,096quantum volume

  9. HardwareSuperconducting

    Quantware Contralto

    25physical qubits

  10. HardwareSuperconducting

    Rigetti Aspen-M-1

    80physical qubits

  11. HardwareTrapped-ionLane record

    IonQ Aria

    25physical qubits

  12. HardwareTrapped-ion

    IonQ Harmony

    11physical qubits

  13. HardwareSuperconducting

    Oxford Quantum Circuits Lucy

    8physical qubits

  14. HardwarePhotonic

    Quandela Ascella

    6physical qubits

  15. HardwareTrapped-ion

    Quantinuum H1-2

    12physical qubits

  16. Qubit countNeutral-atomNew record

    In-situ equalization of single-atom loading in large-scale optical tweezers arrays

    324qubits

    Paper

202114 events

  1. HardwareSuperconducting

    Rigetti Aspen-11

    40physical qubits

  2. Quantum volumeTrapped-ionNew record

    Quantinuum System Model H1-2

    2,048quantum volume

  3. HardwareSuperconducting

    IQM 5-qubit processor

    5physical qubits

  4. HardwareSuperconductingLane record

    IBM Eagle

    127physical qubits

    First >100-qubit superconducting processor.

  5. HardwareSuperconducting

    Rigetti Aspen-10

    32physical qubits

  6. HardwareNeutral-atomLane record

    Atom Computing Phoenix

    100physical qubits

  7. HardwareSuperconducting

    Quantware Soprano

    5physical qubits

  8. Quantum volumeTrapped-ionNew record

    Honeywell System H1

    1,024quantum volume

  9. HardwareTrapped-ionLane record

    Alpine Quantum Technologies PINE System

    24physical qubits

  10. Quantum volumeTrapped-ionNew record

    Honeywell System Model H1

    512quantum volume

  11. HardwareSuperconducting

    Rigetti Aspen-9

    32physical qubits

  12. HardwareSuperconducting

    USTC Zuchongzhi 2.1

    66physical qubits

  13. Qubit countNeutral-atomNew record

    Quantum Phases of Matter on a 256-Atom Programmable Quantum Simulator

    256qubits

    Paper

202015 events

  1. Quantum volumeSuperconducting

    IBM Falcon r4 "Montreal"

    128quantum volume

  2. Quantum volumeTrapped-ionNew record

    Honeywell System Model H1

    128quantum volume

  3. Quantum volumeSuperconducting

    IBM Falcon r4 "Montreal"

    64quantum volume

  4. Quantum volumeTrapped-ionNew record

    Honeywell 2020, June

    64quantum volume

  5. HardwareSuperconducting

    Rigetti Aspen-8

    31physical qubits

  6. HardwareSuperconducting

    QuTech at TU Delft Starmon-5

    5physical qubits

  7. HardwarePhotonicLane record

    USTC Jiuzhang

    76physical qubits

  8. HardwareSuperconducting

    USTC Zuchongzhi

    62physical qubits

  9. Quantum volumeSuperconductingNew record

    IBM Raleigh

    32quantum volume

  10. Code distanceSuperconductingNew record

    Repetition Code [[22,1,22]] — Wootton 2020

    22code distance

    Google Quantum AI · Benchmarking near-term devices with quantum error correction

    Paper

201913 events

  1. HardwareSuperconducting

    Rigetti Aspen-7

    28physical qubits

  2. HardwareSuperconducting

    Google Sycamore

    53physical qubits

    Quantum supremacy claim on random circuit sampling.

  3. HardwareSuperconducting

    IBM Armonk

    1physical qubit

  4. HardwareSuperconducting

    IBM Q 53

    53physical qubits

  5. HardwareSuperconducting

    IBM Burlington

    5physical qubits

  6. HardwareSuperconducting

    IBM Essex

    5physical qubits

  7. HardwareSuperconducting

    IBM London

    5physical qubits

  8. HardwareSuperconducting

    IBM Ourense

    5physical qubits

  9. HardwareSuperconducting

    IBM Vigo

    5physical qubits

  10. HardwareSuperconducting

    Rigetti Aspen-4

    13physical qubits

  11. HardwareSuperconducting

    IBM Q System One

    20physical qubits

    First integrated commercial quantum system.

  12. Qubit countNeutral-atomNew record

    Defect-free assembly of 2D clusters of more than 100 single-atom quantum systems

    111qubits

    Paper

20185 events

  1. HardwareSuperconducting

    Rigetti Aspen-1

    16physical qubits

  2. HardwareSuperconducting

    Rigetti Agave

    8physical qubits

  3. HardwareSuperconductingLane record

    Google Bristlecone

    72physical qubits

  4. HardwareSuperconductingLane record

    Intel Tangle Lake

    49physical qubits

  5. Code distanceSuperconductingNew record

    Repetition Code [[8,1,8]] — Wootton 2018

    8code distance

    IBM Research · A repetition code of 15 qubits

    Paper

20177 events

  1. HardwareSuperconducting

    Rigetti Acorn

    19physical qubits

  2. HardwareSuperconducting

    IBM Q 20 Tokyo

    20physical qubits

  3. HardwareSuperconducting

    Intel 17-Qubit Superconducting Test Chip

    17physical qubits

  4. HardwareSuperconducting

    IBM Q 16 Rüschlikon

    16physical qubits

  5. HardwareSuperconducting

    IBM Q 17

    17physical qubits

  6. HardwareSuperconductingLane record

    Google 20-qubit processor

    20physical qubits

  7. Qubit countNeutral-atomNew record

    Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator

    51qubits

    Paper

Show older · 7 more