Skip to content

Benchmarks

Sources
18
Entries tracked
442
Last sync
49 min
All sources syncing normally
  • QED-C5 days ago
  • QAT · CVP8 hours ago
  • QAT · OE8 hours ago
  • QAT · VP8 hours ago
  • AQCE · QEC14 hours ago
  • AQCE · Errors14 hours ago
  • AQCE · Qubits14 hours ago
  • AQCE · T114 hours ago
  • IonQ fleet49 minutes ago
  • Wikipedia · Processors14 hours ago
  • Wikipedia · QV14 hours ago
  • Metriq · EPLG14 hours ago
  • Metriq · BSEQ14 hours ago
  • Metriq · CLOPS14 hours ago
  • Metriq · QML14 hours ago
  • Metriq · QAOA14 hours ago
  • Metriq · WIT14 hours ago
  • Metriq · Mirror14 hours ago

How is each quantum vendor actually doing?

One scorecard per vendor: the device it ships today, the numbers it has published, what it has promised next and the money behind it. Every figure keeps its source, and vendors are never ranked against each other across modalities.

IonQ

Trapped ion

Ships today

Tempo

64algorithmic qubits (AQ)

announced Jun 2025

AQ is the vendor's own metric
What it counts
Two-qubit gate fidelity
98.33%Aria · Wikipedia
Quantum volume
8Harmony · Wikipedia
Next on the roadmap
AQ 1,024 (algorithmic qubits), scale-out via networking · 2030
Latest round in the ledger
$2B · VentureOct 2026 · Quantum Computing Report
Live fleet
1 of 6 availableIonQ API
3 recent headlines

Quantinuum

Trapped ion

Ships today

Helios

98physical qubits

announced Sep 2025

Two-qubit gate fidelity
99.921%Helios · vendor
Quantum volume
33,554,432Quantinuum System Model H2-2 · Wikipedia
Next on the roadmap
Sol · 2027universal fault-tolerant machine
Latest round in the ledger
$100M · VentureOct 2026 · Inside Quantum Technology
3 recent headlines
Open scorecard — Quantinuum

Alpine Quantum Technologies

Trapped ion

Ships today

LYNX

15physical qubits

announced May 2026

Two-qubit gate fidelity
98.7%IBEX Q1 · Wikipedia
Quantum volume
32,768LYNX · Wikipedia
Largest device to date
24PINE System · physical qubits
Latest round in the ledger
$138.8MOct 2026 · Quantum Computing Report
1 recent headline
Open scorecard — Alpine Quantum Technologies

Pick 2 to 4 vendors with “+ Compare” to see them side by side.

Qubit counts are not comparable across modalities: an atom in a neutral-atom array, an ion in a trap and a superconducting qubit are different things, and each lane trades size against speed and error differently. Compare within a lane.

What the units count

Physical qubits
The hardware qubits on the device, before any error correction.
Atoms
Neutral-atom vendors count the atoms trapped in the array; each one can act as a physical qubit.
Algorithmic qubits (AQ)
IonQ's own system-level metric: the widest circuit at which a fixed set of benchmark algorithms still succeeds. No other vendor publishes it.
Logical qubits
Error-corrected qubits, each encoded across many physical ones. The codes differ between demonstrations, so two records rarely mean the same thing.
Quantum volume
A system-level score (a power of two) from square random circuits. Vendors run it under their own assumptions.
Two-qubit gate fidelity
How often a two-qubit gate does what it should, as a percent. The cards show the best published figure, with its device and source.

Field-wide data

Panels about the field rather than one vendor live on the Field data view.

Reference boards we link to but do not republish: Metriq, Quantum Volume reports, CritPt and others · How the quantum boards work