Arcee-AI · model passport
Trinity Large Preview
trinity-large-preview- Open weights
- Apache 2.0 licence
- 398.6B params
- Released 2026-01-27(HF repo created)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,379#175 of 396
- Best percentile
- 72.4HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)
- Cohort standing
- 51.6median 55.7
What the data says
Benchmarked on 6 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 9.9 pct — Factuality Arena (1,372)
Uneven: 62.5 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 72.4 pct on HHEM Hallucination (Vectara) versus 9.9 pct on Factuality Arena.
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)72.4 pct93.1%Verify →
- Coding61.6 pct1,443Verify →
- Hard prompts57.6 pct1,403Verify →
- Instruction following57.1 pct1,370Verify →
- Overall56.1 pct1,379Verify →
- Factuality Arena9.9 pct1,372Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "arcee-ai/Trinity-Large-Preview"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
trinity-large-preview stands at 51.6 (raw mean 52.4) — measured on 6 of 27 axes.
trinity-large-preview stands at 51.6 versus a cohort median of 55.7 across 112 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
trinity-large-preview scores at percentile 9.9 on Factuality Arena.
trinity-large-preview ranks between #118 and #489 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →