Stepfun · model passport
StepFun: Step 3.5 Flash
step-3-5-flash- Open weights
- Apache 2.0 licence
- 199.4B params
- 262,144 context
- Released 2026-02-01(HF repo created)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,393#158 of 396
- Best percentile
- 73.5IFBench (Artificial Analysis)
- Cohort standing
- 54.9median 56.4
What the data says
Benchmarked on 6 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 47.9 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 73.5 pct on IFBench (Artificial Analysis) versus 25.6 pct on Factuality Arena.
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)73.5 pct64.6%Verify →
- Coding63.4 pct1,449Verify →
- Instruction following61.4 pct1,384Verify →
- Overall60.4 pct1,393Verify →
- Hard prompts59.6 pct1,412Verify →
- Factuality Arena25.6 pct1,416Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "stepfun-ai/Step-3.5-Flash"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Use it hosted
stepfun/step-3.5-flashAPI parameters this endpoint supports
Example request
curl https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"stepfun/step-3.5-flash","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Hello"}]}'Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
step-3.5-flash stands at 54.9 (raw mean 57.3) — measured on 6 of 27 axes.
step-3.5-flash stands at 54.9 versus a cohort median of 56.4 across 110 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
step-3.5-flash ranks between #111 and #373 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →