Ant-Group · model passport
Ring Flash 2.0
ring-flash-2-0- Open weights
- MIT licence
- 102.9B params
- Released 2025-09-19(HF repo created)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,323#236 of 396
- Best percentile
- 66.0LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)
- Cohort standing
- 50.8median 52.6
What the data says
Benchmarked on 7 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 25.3 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 66 pct on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis) versus 40.7 pct on Overall.
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)66 pct62.8%Verify →
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)64 pct79.3%Verify →
- Coding48.3 pct1,390Verify →
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)48.1 pct43.3%Verify →
- Hard prompts46 pct1,352Verify →
- Instruction following44.7 pct1,316Verify →
- Overall40.7 pct1,323Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "inclusionAI/Ring-flash-2.0"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
ring-flash-2.0 stands at 50.8 (raw mean 51.1) — measured on 7 of 27 axes.
ring-flash-2.0 stands at 50.8 versus a cohort median of 52.6 across 147 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
ring-flash-2.0 ranks between #177 and #340 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →