Alibaba · model passport
QwQ 32b Preview
qwq-32b-preview- Open weights
- Apache 2.0 licence
- 32.8B params
- Released 2024-11-27(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,154#353 of 396
- Best percentile
- 44.3LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)
- Cohort standing
- 29.7median 41.3
What the data says
Benchmarked on 7 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 9 pct — Coding (1,174)
- 11.1 pct — Overall (1,154)
- 11.9 pct — Hard prompts (1,168)
Uneven: 35.3 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 44.3 pct on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis) versus 9 pct on Coding.
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)44.3 pct33.7%Verify →
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)31.1 pct64.8%Verify →
- LiveBench27.5 pct40.2%Verify →
- Instruction following12.6 pct1,145Verify →
- Hard prompts11.9 pct1,168Verify →
- Overall11.1 pct1,154Verify →
- Coding9 pct1,174Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "Qwen/QwQ-32B-Preview"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
qwq-32b-preview stands at 29.7 (raw mean 21.1) — measured on 7 of 27 axes.
qwq-32b-preview stands at 29.7 versus a cohort median of 41.3 across 136 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
qwq-32b-preview scores in the 9th percentile on Coding.
qwq-32b-preview scores at percentile 11.1 on Overall.
qwq-32b-preview ranks between #365 and #889 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Conversation-first", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →