Alibaba · model passport
QwQ 32b
qwq-32b- Open weights
- Apache 2.0 licence
- 32.8B params
- Released 2025-03-05(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,336#221 of 396
- Best percentile
- 80.8LiveBench
- Cohort standing
- 51.0median 45.4
What the data says
Benchmarked on 10 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 43.5 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 80.8 pct on LiveBench versus 37.3 pct on IFBench (Artificial Analysis).
- LiveBench80.8 pct69.5%Verify →
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)66.8 pct63.1%Verify →
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)55.8 pct76.4%Verify →
- Hard prompts46.5 pct1,356Verify →
- Instruction following46 pct1,323Verify →
- Coding45.8 pct1,383Verify →
- GPQA Diamond45.7 pct65.3%Verify →
- Overall44.4 pct1,336Verify →
- AIME (math)43.5 pct59.2%Verify →
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)37.3 pct38.8%Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "Qwen/QwQ-32B"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
qwq-32b stands at 51 (raw mean 51.3) — measured on 10 of 27 axes.
qwq-32b stands at 51 versus a cohort median of 45.4 across 146 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
qwq-32b ranks between #188 and #343 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →