Alibaba · model passport
Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
qwen3-5-plus- 1,000,000 context
- Released 2026-02-15(from model name)
- Best percentile
- 68.3GPQA Diamond
- Cohort standing
- 50.3median 57.4
What the data says
Benchmarked on 5 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 47.6 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 68.3 pct on GPQA Diamond versus 20.7 pct on SimpleQA Verified.
- GPQA Diamond68.3 pct84.8%Verify →
- AIME (math)67 pct86.7%Verify →
- FrontierMath59.4 pct21.0%Verify →
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)37.1 pct89.3%Verify →
- SimpleQA Verified20.7 pct25.4%Verify →
- OverallNot benchmarked
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
- CodingNot benchmarked
- Instruction followingNot benchmarked
- Hard promptsNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Use it hosted
qwen/qwen3.5-plus-20260420API parameters this endpoint supports
Example request
curl https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"qwen/qwen3.5-plus-20260420","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Hello"}]}'Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
qwen3.5-plus stands at 50.3 (raw mean 50.5) — measured on 5 of 27 axes.
qwen3.5-plus stands at 50.3 versus a cohort median of 57.4 across 108 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
qwen3.5-plus ranks between #106 and #403 across 4 built-in weightings — best under "Reasoning", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →