Skip to content

Alibaba · model passport

Qwen3 5 Max Preview

qwen3-5-max-preview
  • Cloud only
  • Proprietary licence
  • Released 2026-10-15(first seen on LMArena)
5/27axes covered
Overall · LMArena
1,464#50 of 396
Best percentile
91.4Instruction following
Cohort standing
74.5median 60.6

What the data says

Benchmarked on 5 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.

Strongest axes

  • 91.4 pct — Instruction following (1,467)
  • 89.9 pct — Hard prompts (1,491)
  • 89 pct — Factuality Arena (1,474)

Uneven: 3.8 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 91.4 pct on Instruction following versus 87.6 pct on Overall.

  • Instruction following91.4 pct1,467Verify →
  • Hard prompts89.9 pct1,491Verify →
  • Factuality Arena89 pct1,474Verify →
  • Coding88.5 pct1,513Verify →
  • Overall87.6 pct1,464Verify →
  • WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Search ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Document ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
  • GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
  • AIME (math)Not benchmarked
  • FrontierMathNot benchmarked
  • SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
  • ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
  • Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
  • SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
  • LiveBenchNot benchmarked
  • BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
  • SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
  • MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
  • LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
  • IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
  • HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
  • SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
  • Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked

Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.

  • qwen3.5-max-preview stands at 74.5 (raw mean 89.3) — measured on 5 of 27 axes.

    standingtemplateVerify →
  • qwen3.5-max-preview stands at 74.5 versus a cohort median of 60.6 across 169 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.

    cohorttemplateVerify →

Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →