Alibaba · model passport
Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B
qwen3-5-9b- Open weights
- 9.7B params
- 262,144 context
- Released 2026-02-27(HF repo created)
- Best percentile
- 76.2IFBench (Artificial Analysis)
- Cohort standing
- 47.9median 57.4
What the data says
Benchmarked on 4 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 4.5 pct — Terminal-Bench (9.2%)
Uneven: 71.7 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 76.2 pct on IFBench (Artificial Analysis) versus 4.5 pct on Terminal-Bench.
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)76.2 pct66.7%Verify →
- GPQA Diamond60.2 pct79.0%Verify →
- AIME (math)44 pct61.7%Verify →
- Terminal-Bench4.5 pct9.2%Verify →
- OverallNot benchmarked
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- CodingNot benchmarked
- Instruction followingNot benchmarked
- Hard promptsNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Use it hosted
qwen/qwen3.5-9bAPI parameters this endpoint supports
Example request
curl https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"qwen/qwen3.5-9b","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Hello"}]}'Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
qwen3.5-9B stands at 47.9 (raw mean 46.2) — measured on 4 of 27 axes.
qwen3.5-9B stands at 47.9 versus a cohort median of 57.4 across 108 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
qwen3.5-9B scores at percentile 4.5 on Terminal-Bench.
qwen3.5-9B ranks between #151 and #401 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Agentic", worst under "Coding-focused".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →