Alibaba · model passport
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
qwen3-5-397b-a17b- Open weights
- Apache 2.0 licence
- 403.4B params
- 262,144 context
- Released 2026-02-16(HF repo created)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,442#84 of 396
- Best percentile
- 96.9IFBench (Artificial Analysis)
- Cohort standing
- 66.9median 56.8
What the data says
Benchmarked on 10 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Strongest axes
- 96.9 pct — IFBench (Artificial Analysis) (78.8%)
Uneven: 57.3 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 96.9 pct on IFBench (Artificial Analysis) versus 39.6 pct on WebDev Arena.
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)96.9 pct78.8%Verify →
- Hard prompts79.8 pct1,463Verify →
- Instruction following79.5 pct1,433Verify →
- Overall79 pct1,442Verify →
- Coding78.8 pct1,491Verify →
- GPQA Diamond71.5 pct86.4%Verify →
- AIME (math)70.5 pct88.9%Verify →
- Vision Arena66 pct1,246Verify →
- Factuality Arena58.1 pct1,445Verify →
- WebDev Arena39.6 pct1,400Verify →
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "Qwen/Qwen3.5-397B-A17B"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Use it hosted
qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17bAPI parameters this endpoint supports
Example request
curl https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Hello"}]}'Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
qwen3.5-397b-a17b stands at 66.9 (raw mean 72) — measured on 10 of 27 axes.
qwen3.5-397b-a17b stands at 66.9 versus a cohort median of 56.8 across 109 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
qwen3.5-397b-a17b scores at percentile 96.9 on IFBench (Artificial Analysis).
qwen3.5-397b-a17b ranks between #63 and #174 across 6 built-in weightings — best under "Reasoning", worst under "Coding-focused".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →