Alibaba · model passport
Qwen2 5 72b Instruct
qwen2-5-72b-instruct- Open weights
- Qwen licence
- 72.7B params
- Released 2024-09-19(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,303#265 of 396
- Best percentile
- 48.8LiveBench
- Cohort standing
- 39.9median 38.1
What the data says
Benchmarked on 7 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 25.3 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 48.8 pct on LiveBench versus 23.5 pct on AIME (math).
- LiveBench48.8 pct52.9%Verify →
- Coding37.3 pct1,355Verify →
- Instruction following36.1 pct1,292Verify →
- Hard prompts35.9 pct1,317Verify →
- GPQA Diamond33.9 pct49.1%Verify →
- Overall33.3 pct1,303Verify →
- AIME (math)23.5 pct8.1%Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "Qwen/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
qwen2.5-72b-instruct stands at 39.9 (raw mean 35.6) — measured on 7 of 27 axes.
qwen2.5-72b-instruct stands at 39.9 versus a cohort median of 38.1 across 133 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
qwen2.5-72b-instruct ranks between #227 and #722 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →