Alibaba · model passport
Qwen1 5 32b Chat
qwen1-5-32b-chat- Open weights
- Qianwen LICENSE licence
- 32.5B params
- Released 2024-04-02(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,204#326 of 396
- Best percentile
- 19.4Coding
- Cohort standing
- 29.4median 32.9
What the data says
Benchmarked on 5 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 11.8 pct — GPQA Diamond (30.7%)
Uneven: 7.6 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 19.4 pct on Coding versus 11.8 pct on GPQA Diamond.
- Coding19.4 pct1,262Verify →
- Hard prompts18.4 pct1,222Verify →
- Overall17.9 pct1,204Verify →
- Instruction following17.7 pct1,185Verify →
- GPQA Diamond11.8 pct30.7%Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "Qwen/Qwen1.5-32B-Chat"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
qwen1.5-32b-chat stands at 29.4 (raw mean 17) — measured on 5 of 27 axes.
qwen1.5-32b-chat stands at 29.4 versus a cohort median of 32.9 across 116 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
qwen1.5-32b-chat scores at percentile 11.8 on GPQA Diamond.
qwen1.5-32b-chat ranks between #320 and #933 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →