Microsoft · model passport
Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
phi-3-mini-4k-instruct- Open weights
- MIT licence
- 3.8B params
- Released 2024-04-23(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,128#370 of 396
- Best percentile
- 10.7Coding
- Cohort standing
- 24.3median 33.1
What the data says
Benchmarked on 5 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 6.8 pct — Overall (1,128)
- 8.3 pct — Instruction following (1,113)
- 8.9 pct — LiveBench (24.5%)
Uneven: 3.9 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 10.7 pct on Coding versus 6.8 pct on Overall.
- Coding10.7 pct1,188Verify →
- Hard prompts9.6 pct1,154Verify →
- LiveBench8.9 pct24.5%Verify →
- Instruction following8.3 pct1,113Verify →
- Overall6.8 pct1,128Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "microsoft/Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
phi-3-mini-4k-instruct stands at 24.3 (raw mean 8.9) — measured on 5 of 27 axes.
phi-3-mini-4k-instruct stands at 24.3 versus a cohort median of 33.1 across 118 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
phi-3-mini-4k-instruct scores at percentile 6.8 on Overall.
phi-3-mini-4k-instruct scores at percentile 8.3 on Instruction following.
phi-3-mini-4k-instruct ranks between #364 and #968 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →