Allenai · model passport
Olmo 3 1 32b Think
olmo-3-1-32b-think- Open weights
- Apache 2.0 licence
- 32.2B params
- Released 2025-12-10(HF repo created)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,287#279 of 396
- Best percentile
- 77.1LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)
- Cohort standing
- 44.1median 54.9
What the data says
Benchmarked on 8 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 0.6 pct — Factuality Arena (1,301)
Uneven: 76.5 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 77.1 pct on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis) versus 0.6 pct on Factuality Arena.
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)77.1 pct69.5%Verify →
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)74.4 pct66.0%Verify →
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)55.1 pct76.3%Verify →
- Coding33.2 pct1,341Verify →
- Instruction following32.6 pct1,280Verify →
- Hard prompts32.6 pct1,305Verify →
- Overall29.8 pct1,287Verify →
- Factuality Arena0.6 pct1,301Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "allenai/Olmo-3.1-32B-Think"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
olmo-3.1-32b-think stands at 44.1 (raw mean 41.9) — measured on 8 of 27 axes.
olmo-3.1-32b-think stands at 44.1 versus a cohort median of 54.9 across 123 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
olmo-3.1-32b-think scores at percentile 0.6 on Factuality Arena.
olmo-3.1-32b-think ranks between #249 and #478 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →