Nvidia · model passport
Nvidia Llama 3 3 Nemotron Super 49b V1 5
nvidia-llama-3-3-nemotron-super-49b-v1-5- Open weights
- Nvidia Open licence
- Released 2026-10-15(first seen on LMArena)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,343#212 of 396
- Best percentile
- 51.4Coding
- Cohort standing
- 49.0median 60.7
What the data says
Benchmarked on 4 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 5.7 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 51.4 pct on Coding versus 45.7 pct on Instruction following.
- Coding51.4 pct1,403Verify →
- Hard prompts49 pct1,364Verify →
- Overall46.7 pct1,343Verify →
- Instruction following45.7 pct1,322Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
nvidia-llama-3.3-nemotron-super-49b-v1.5 stands at 49 (raw mean 48.2) — measured on 4 of 27 axes.
nvidia-llama-3.3-nemotron-super-49b-v1.5 stands at 49 versus a cohort median of 60.7 across 169 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
nvidia-llama-3.3-nemotron-super-49b-v1.5 ranks between #160 and #441 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →