Model passport
Mpt 7b Chat
mpt-7b-chat- Open weights
- CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0 licence
- Released 2023-05-04(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,064#387 of 396
- Best percentile
- 2.6Coding
- Cohort standing
- 22.8median 24.1
What the data says
Benchmarked on 4 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 2.3 pct — Instruction following (1,009)
- 2.5 pct — Hard prompts (1,033)
- 2.5 pct — Overall (1,064)
Uneven: 0.3 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 2.6 pct on Coding versus 2.3 pct on Instruction following.
- Coding2.6 pct1,066Verify →
- Overall2.5 pct1,064Verify →
- Hard prompts2.5 pct1,033Verify →
- Instruction following2.3 pct1,009Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
mpt-7b-chat stands at 22.8 (raw mean 2.5) — measured on 4 of 27 axes.
mpt-7b-chat stands at 22.8 versus a cohort median of 24.1 across 32 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
mpt-7b-chat scores at percentile 2.3 on Instruction following.
mpt-7b-chat scores at percentile 2.5 on Overall.
mpt-7b-chat ranks between #403 and #866 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Conversation-first", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →