Mistral · model passport
Mistral Large 3
mistral-large-3- Open weights
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Released 2025-10-24(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,414#132 of 396
- Best percentile
- 71.1Coding
- Cohort standing
- 52.0median 53.3
What the data says
Benchmarked on 10 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 8.6 pct — WebDev Arena (1,230)
Uneven: 62.5 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 71.1 pct on Coding versus 8.6 pct on WebDev Arena.
- Coding71.1 pct1,471Verify →
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)70.4 pct80.7%Verify →
- Instruction following67.2 pct1,402Verify →
- Overall66.9 pct1,414Verify →
- Hard prompts66.7 pct1,432Verify →
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)54.2 pct46.5%Verify →
- Vision Arena46 pct1,200Verify →
- Factuality Arena44.2 pct1,434Verify →
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)30.9 pct36.2%Verify →
- WebDev Arena8.6 pct1,230Verify →
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
mistral-large-3 stands at 52 (raw mean 52.6) — measured on 10 of 27 axes.
mistral-large-3 stands at 52 versus a cohort median of 53.3 across 137 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
mistral-large-3 scores at percentile 8.6 on WebDev Arena.
mistral-large-3 ranks between #132 and #517 across 6 built-in weightings — best under "Conversation-first", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →