Skip to content

Xiaomi · model passport

Mimo V2 Pro

mimo-v2-pro
  • Cloud only
  • Proprietary licence
  • Released 2026-10-13(first seen on LMArena)
8/27axes covered
Overall · LMArena
1,448#73 of 396
Best percentile
84.3Instruction following
Cohort standing
66.0median 60.6

What the data says

Benchmarked on 8 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.

Uneven: 37.5 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 84.3 pct on Instruction following versus 46.8 pct on WebDev Arena.

  • Instruction following84.3 pct1,445Verify →
  • Coding84.1 pct1,503Verify →
  • Hard prompts83.8 pct1,475Verify →
  • Overall81.8 pct1,448Verify →
  • IFBench (Artificial Analysis)80.2 pct68.8%Verify →
  • LiveBench59.5 pct58.1%Verify →
  • Factuality Arena55.2 pct1,443Verify →
  • WebDev Arena46.8 pct1,434Verify →
  • Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Search ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Document ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
  • GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
  • AIME (math)Not benchmarked
  • FrontierMathNot benchmarked
  • SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
  • ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
  • Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
  • SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
  • BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
  • SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
  • MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
  • LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
  • HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
  • SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
  • Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked

Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.

  • mimo-v2-pro stands at 66 (raw mean 72) — measured on 8 of 27 axes.

    standingtemplateVerify →
  • mimo-v2-pro stands at 66 versus a cohort median of 60.6 across 168 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.

    cohorttemplateVerify →

Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →