Skip to content

Xiaomi · model passport

Mimo V2 Flash Thinking

mimo-v2-flash-thinking
  • Open weights
  • MIT licence
  • Released 2026-10-15(first seen on LMArena (approximate))
6/27axes covered
Overall · LMArena
1,386#198 of 469
Best percentile
60.1Hard prompts
Cohort standing
46.9median 57.9

What the data says

Benchmarked on 6 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.

Weakest axes

  • 15 pct — WebDev Arena (1,292)

Uneven: 45.1 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 60.1 pct on Hard prompts versus 15 pct on WebDev Arena.

  • Hard prompts60.1 pct1,411Verify →
  • Instruction following58.8 pct1,375Verify →
  • Coding58.3 pct1,433Verify →
  • Overall58 pct1,386Verify →
  • Factuality Arena21.4 pct1,409Verify →
  • WebDev Arena15 pct1,292Verify →
  • Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Search ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Document ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
  • GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
  • AIME (math)Not benchmarked
  • FrontierMathNot benchmarked
  • SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
  • ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
  • Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
  • SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
  • LiveBenchNot benchmarked
  • BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
  • SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
  • MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
  • LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
  • IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
  • HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
  • SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
  • Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked

Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.

  • The mimo-v2-flash (thinking) model from xiaomi covers 6 of 27 axes with a composite score of 45.3 and a shrunk score of 46.9, representing 46.9% coverage without thin coverage.

    standingVerify →
  • In the xiaomi mimo-v2-flash (thinking) cohort of 224 models, the model standing is 46.9, which is below the cohort median standing of 57.9 over a window of 180 days.

Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →