Xiaomi · model passport
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5
mimo-v2-5- Open weights
- MIT licence
- 310.8B params
- 1,050,000 context
- Released 2026-04-27(HF repo created)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,434#96 of 396
- Best percentile
- 79.5Hard prompts
- Cohort standing
- 63.7median 59.5
What the data says
Benchmarked on 8 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 28.9 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 79.5 pct on Hard prompts versus 50.6 pct on Factuality Arena.
- Hard prompts79.5 pct1,462Verify →
- Instruction following79 pct1,431Verify →
- Coding78.5 pct1,491Verify →
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)76.9 pct67.1%Verify →
- Overall76 pct1,434Verify →
- Vision Arena59.3 pct1,234Verify →
- WebDev Arena51.1 pct1,438Verify →
- Factuality Arena50.6 pct1,439Verify →
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-V2.5"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Use it hosted
xiaomi/mimo-v2.5API parameters this endpoint supports
Example request
curl https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"xiaomi/mimo-v2.5","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Hello"}]}'Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
mimo-v2.5 stands at 63.7 (raw mean 68.9) — measured on 8 of 27 axes.
mimo-v2.5 stands at 63.7 versus a cohort median of 59.5 across 221 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
mimo-v2.5 ranks between #73 and #196 across 6 built-in weightings — best under "Agentic", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →