Meta · model passport
Meta: Llama 4 Scout
llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct- Open weights
- Llama licence
- 108.6B params
- 1,310,720 context
- Released 2025-04-05(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,322#240 of 396
- Best percentile
- 64.8HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)
- Cohort standing
- 36.4median 48.1
What the data says
Benchmarked on 11 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 2.9 pct — FrontierMath (0.0%)
- 11.2 pct — ARC-AGI-2 (0.0%)
Uneven: 61.9 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 64.8 pct on HHEM Hallucination (Vectara) versus 2.9 pct on FrontierMath.
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)64.8 pct92.3%Verify →
- Hard prompts40.4 pct1,329Verify →
- Coding40.2 pct1,363Verify →
- Overall39.6 pct1,322Verify →
- Instruction following38.1 pct1,299Verify →
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Dormant board36.6 pct28.1%Verify →
- GPQA Diamond36.2 pct51.8%Verify →
- Vision Arena26.7 pct1,127Verify →
- AIME (math)22.5 pct7.8%Verify →
- ARC-AGI-211.2 pct0.0%Verify →
- FrontierMath2.9 pct0.0%Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Use it hosted
meta-llama/llama-4-scoutAPI parameters this endpoint supports
Example request
curl https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"meta-llama/llama-4-scout","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Hello"}]}'Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct stands at 36.4 (raw mean 32.7) — measured on 11 of 27 axes.
llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct stands at 36.4 versus a cohort median of 48.1 across 151 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct scores at percentile 2.9 on FrontierMath.
llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct scores at percentile 11.2 on ARC-AGI-2.
llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct ranks between #212 and #935 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →