Meta · model passport
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick
llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct- Open weights
- Llama 4 licence
- 401.6B params
- 1,048,576 context
- Released 2025-04-05(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,327#229 of 396
- Best percentile
- 52.2LiveBench
- Cohort standing
- 38.0median 48.1
What the data says
Benchmarked on 9 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 11.2 pct — ARC-AGI-2 (0.0%)
Uneven: 41 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 52.2 pct on LiveBench versus 11.2 pct on ARC-AGI-2.
- LiveBench52.2 pct54.4%Verify →
- Coding43.5 pct1,373Verify →
- Hard prompts43.4 pct1,339Verify →
- Overall42.4 pct1,327Verify →
- Instruction following42.2 pct1,314Verify →
- Vision Arena30 pct1,145Verify →
- SimpleBench21.8 pct27.7%Verify →
- Humanity's Last Exam19.6 pct5.7%Verify →
- ARC-AGI-211.2 pct0.0%Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "meta-llama/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Use it hosted
meta-llama/llama-4-maverickAPI parameters this endpoint supports
Example request
curl https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"meta-llama/llama-4-maverick","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Hello"}]}'Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct stands at 38 (raw mean 34) — measured on 9 of 27 axes.
llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct stands at 38 versus a cohort median of 48.1 across 151 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct scores at percentile 11.2 on ARC-AGI-2.
llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct ranks between #199 and #924 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →