Nvidia · model passport
Llama 3 1 Nemotron Ultra 253b V1
llama-3-1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1- Open weights
- Nvidia Open Model licence
- 253.4B params
- Released 2025-04-08(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,348#204 of 396
- Best percentile
- 81.3MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)
- Cohort standing
- 49.1median 47.8
What the data says
Benchmarked on 8 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 2.4 pct — BFCL v4 (function calling) (10.0%)
Uneven: 78.9 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 81.3 pct on MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis) versus 2.4 pct on BFCL v4 (function calling).
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)81.3 pct82.5%Verify →
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)67.9 pct64.1%Verify →
- Instruction following52.8 pct1,351Verify →
- Hard prompts52 pct1,375Verify →
- Overall48.7 pct1,348Verify →
- Coding48.6 pct1,391Verify →
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)36.1 pct38.2%Verify →
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Dormant board2.4 pct10.0%Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "nvidia/Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1 stands at 49.1 (raw mean 48.7) — measured on 8 of 27 axes.
llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1 stands at 49.1 versus a cohort median of 47.8 across 151 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1 scores at percentile 2.4 on BFCL v4 (function calling).
llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1 ranks between #176 and #482 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →