Ant-Group · model passport
Ling Flash 2.0
ling-flash-2-0- Open weights
- MIT licence
- 102.9B params
- Released 2025-09-17(HF repo created)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,343#210 of 396
- Best percentile
- 62.2LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)
- Cohort standing
- 49.0median 52.6
What the data says
Benchmarked on 7 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 35.3 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 62.2 pct on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis) versus 26.9 pct on IFBench (Artificial Analysis).
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)62.2 pct58.9%Verify →
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)58.8 pct77.7%Verify →
- Coding52.2 pct1,409Verify →
- Hard prompts49.2 pct1,365Verify →
- Overall47.2 pct1,343Verify →
- Instruction following43.9 pct1,316Verify →
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)26.9 pct34.4%Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "inclusionAI/Ling-flash-2.0"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
The ling-flash-2.0 model from ant-group has a shrunk composite score of 49 (raw composite 48.6), with scores on 7 of 27 axes, and its coverage is not flagged as thin.
standingVerify →The model ling-flash-2.0 from ant-group has a standing of 49, compared with a cohort median standing of 52.6 across a cohort size of 147 over a cohort window of 180 days.
cohortVerify →
The ranking of ling-flash-2.0 from ant-group varied between rank 156 and rank 436 across 5 templates, a spread of 280, with its best rank under the Coding-focused template and its worst under the All sources template.
rank swingVerify →
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →