Moonshot · model passport
Kimi K2 Instruct
kimi-k2-instruct- Best percentile
- 50.8SWE-bench Verified (live board)
- Composite standing
- 42.2shrunk · 4/27 axes
What the data says
Benchmarked on 4 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 33.6 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 50.8 pct on SWE-bench Verified (live board) versus 17.2 pct on SimpleBench.
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)50.8 pct53.4%Verify →
- LiveBench50.2 pct53.8%Verify →
- Terminal-Bench27.3 pct27.8%Verify →
- SimpleBench17.2 pct26.3%Verify →
- OverallNot benchmarked
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- CodingNot benchmarked
- Instruction followingNot benchmarked
- Hard promptsNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
Kimi-K2-Instruct stands at 42.2 (raw mean 36.4) — measured on 4 of 27 axes.
Kimi-K2-Instruct ranks between #108 and #588 across 3 built-in weightings — best under "Agentic", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →