Moonshot · model passport
Kimi K2 0905 Preview
kimi-k2-0905-preview- Open weights
- Modified MIT licence
- Released 2025-09-05(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,419#120 of 396
- Best percentile
- 83.1SWE-bench Verified (live board)
- Cohort standing
- 58.3median 51.9
What the data says
Benchmarked on 6 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Uneven: 64.5 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 83.1 pct on SWE-bench Verified (live board) versus 18.6 pct on Factuality Arena.
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)83.1 pct71.2%Verify →
- Coding70.6 pct1,468Verify →
- Overall69.9 pct1,419Verify →
- Hard prompts69.4 pct1,438Verify →
- Instruction following63.1 pct1,391Verify →
- Factuality Arena18.6 pct1,402Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
kimi-k2-0905-preview stands at 58.3 (raw mean 62.5) — measured on 6 of 27 axes.
kimi-k2-0905-preview stands at 58.3 versus a cohort median of 51.9 across 146 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
kimi-k2-0905-preview ranks between #85 and #314 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →