Kwaikat · model passport
Kat Coder Pro V1
kat-coder-pro-v1- Cloud only
- Proprietary licence
- Released 2026-10-13(first seen on LMArena)
- Best percentile
- 84.4LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)
- Cohort standing
- 57.3median 60.7
What the data says
Benchmarked on 4 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 13.7 pct — WebDev Arena (1,256)
Uneven: 70.7 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 84.4 pct on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis) versus 13.7 pct on WebDev Arena.
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)84.4 pct74.7%Verify →
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)79.3 pct68.4%Verify →
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)73.8 pct81.3%Verify →
- WebDev Arena13.7 pct1,256Verify →
- OverallNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
- CodingNot benchmarked
- Instruction followingNot benchmarked
- Hard promptsNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 stands at 57.3 (raw mean 62.8) — measured on 4 of 27 axes.
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 stands at 57.3 versus a cohort median of 60.7 across 169 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 scores at percentile 13.7 on WebDev Arena.
KAT-Coder-Pro V1 ranks between #131 and #409 across 4 built-in weightings — best under "Agentic", worst under "All-rounder".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →