Skip to content

xAI · model passport

Grok 4 Fast

grok-4-fast
  • Cloud only
  • Proprietary licence
  • Released 2025-09-19(curated)
5/27axes covered
Best percentile
93.5LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)
Cohort standing
53.9median 52.2

What the data says

Benchmarked on 5 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.

Strongest axes

  • 93.5 pct — LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis) (83.2%)
  • 91.4 pct — MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis) (85.0%)

Weakest axes

  • 2.9 pct — WebDev Arena (1,160)

Uneven: 90.6 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 93.5 pct on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis) versus 2.9 pct on WebDev Arena.

  • LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)93.5 pct83.2%Verify →
  • MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)91.4 pct85.0%Verify →
  • IFBench (Artificial Analysis)57.7 pct50.5%Verify →
  • ARC-AGI-236 pct5.3%Verify →
  • WebDev Arena2.9 pct1,160Verify →
  • OverallNot benchmarked
  • Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Search ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Document ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
  • GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
  • AIME (math)Not benchmarked
  • FrontierMathNot benchmarked
  • SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
  • Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
  • SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
  • LiveBenchNot benchmarked
  • BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
  • SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
  • HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
  • SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
  • Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
  • CodingNot benchmarked
  • Instruction followingNot benchmarked
  • Hard promptsNot benchmarked

Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.

  • Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) stands at 53.9 (raw mean 56.3) — measured on 5 of 27 axes.

    standingtemplateVerify →
  • Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) stands at 53.9 versus a cohort median of 52.2 across 147 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.

    cohorttemplateVerify →

Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →