xAI · model passport
Grok 4 1 Fast Reasoning
grok-4-1-fast-reasoning- Cloud only
- Proprietary licence
- Released 2026-10-09(first seen on LMArena)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,430#103 of 396
- Best percentile
- 95.1BFCL v4 (function calling)
- Cohort standing
- 53.0median 60.7
What the data says
Benchmarked on 11 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Strongest axes
- 95.1 pct — BFCL v4 (function calling) (69.6%)
Weakest axes
- 8.6 pct — HHEM Hallucination (Vectara) (80.8%)
- 10.1 pct — WebDev Arena (1,242)
Uneven: 86.5 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 95.1 pct on BFCL v4 (function calling) versus 8.6 pct on HHEM Hallucination (Vectara).
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Dormant board95.1 pct69.6%Verify →
- Overall74.2 pct1,430Verify →
- Hard prompts70.2 pct1,441Verify →
- Coding68.5 pct1,461Verify →
- LiveBench68 pct63.0%Verify →
- Instruction following66.9 pct1,402Verify →
- SimpleBench62.1 pct56.0%Verify →
- Vision Arena44.7 pct1,196Verify →
- Factuality Arena23.3 pct1,413Verify →
- WebDev Arena10.1 pct1,242Verify →
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)8.6 pct80.8%Verify →
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
grok-4-1-fast-reasoning stands at 53 (raw mean 53.8) — measured on 11 of 27 axes.
grok-4-1-fast-reasoning stands at 53 versus a cohort median of 60.7 across 171 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
grok-4-1-fast-reasoning scores at percentile 95.1 on BFCL v4 (function calling).
grok-4-1-fast-reasoning scores at percentile 8.6 on HHEM Hallucination (Vectara).
grok-4-1-fast-reasoning scores at percentile 10.1 on WebDev Arena.
grok-4-1-fast-reasoning shows a 86.6-point percentile gap across 11 covered axes: 95.1 on BFCL v4 (function calling) versus 8.6 on HHEM Hallucination (Vectara).
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →