xAI · model passport
Grok 3 Mini
grok-3-mini- Cloud only
- Proprietary licence
- Released 2025-02-19(curated)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,364#188 of 396
- Best percentile
- 54.8Instruction following
- Cohort standing
- 46.6median 44.4
What the data says
Benchmarked on 5 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 13.5 pct — ARC-AGI-2 (0.4%)
Uneven: 41.3 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 54.8 pct on Instruction following versus 13.5 pct on ARC-AGI-2.
- Instruction following54.8 pct1,361Verify →
- Overall52.8 pct1,364Verify →
- Hard prompts52.3 pct1,378Verify →
- Coding49.4 pct1,392Verify →
- ARC-AGI-213.5 pct0.4%Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
grok-3-mini-high stands at 46.6 (raw mean 44.5) — measured on 5 of 27 axes.
grok-3-mini-high stands at 46.6 versus a cohort median of 44.4 across 146 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
grok-3-mini-high scores at percentile 13.5 on ARC-AGI-2.
grok-3-mini-high ranks between #172 and #648 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →