Skip to content

xAI · model passport

Grok 3

grok-3
7/27axes covered
Best percentile
79.0HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)
Composite standing
49.0shrunk · 7/27 axes

What the data says

Benchmarked on 7 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.

Weakest axes

  • 11.2 pct — ARC-AGI-2 (0.0%)

Uneven: 67.8 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 79 pct on HHEM Hallucination (Vectara) versus 11.2 pct on ARC-AGI-2.

  • HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)79 pct94.2%Verify →
  • MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)66.7 pct79.9%Verify →
  • IFBench (Artificial Analysis)53.1 pct46.9%Verify →
  • LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)51.9 pct42.5%Verify →
  • LiveBench48.1 pct52.6%Verify →
  • SimpleBench29.9 pct36.1%Verify →
  • ARC-AGI-211.2 pct0.0%Verify →
  • OverallNot benchmarked
  • WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Search ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Document ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
  • GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
  • AIME (math)Not benchmarked
  • FrontierMathNot benchmarked
  • SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
  • Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
  • BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
  • SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
  • SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
  • Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
  • CodingNot benchmarked
  • Instruction followingNot benchmarked
  • Hard promptsNot benchmarked

Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.

  • grok-3 stands at 49 (raw mean 48.6) — measured on 7 of 27 axes.

    standingtemplateVerify →

Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →