Ibm · model passport
Granite 4 2 30b
granite-4-2-30b- Open weights
- Apache 2.0 licence
- 29.3B params
- Released 2026-08-07(HF repo created)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,340#216 of 396
- Best percentile
- 50.6Coding
- Cohort standing
- 44.5median 60.2
What the data says
Benchmarked on 5 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Weakest axes
- 11 pct — Factuality Arena (1,375)
Uneven: 39.6 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 50.6 pct on Coding versus 11 pct on Factuality Arena.
- Coding50.6 pct1,401Verify →
- Instruction following49.7 pct1,339Verify →
- Hard prompts48.7 pct1,363Verify →
- Overall45.7 pct1,340Verify →
- Factuality Arena11 pct1,375Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "ibm-granite/granite-4.2-30b"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
granite-4.2-30b stands at 44.5 (raw mean 41.2) — measured on 5 of 27 axes.
granite-4.2-30b stands at 44.5 versus a cohort median of 60.2 across 191 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
granite-4.2-30b scores in the 11th percentile on Factuality Arena.
granite-4.2-30b ranks between #164 and #724 across 5 built-in weightings — best under "Coding-focused", worst under "All sources".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →