Skip to content

Ibm · model passport

Granite 4.0 H Small

granite-4-0-h-small
4/27axes covered
Best percentile
88.6HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)
Composite standing
45.2shrunk · 4/27 axes

What the data says

Benchmarked on 4 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.

Strongest axes

  • 88.6 pct — HHEM Hallucination (Vectara) (94.8%)

Uneven: 69.2 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 88.6 pct on HHEM Hallucination (Vectara) versus 19.4 pct on IFBench (Artificial Analysis).

  • HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)88.6 pct94.8%Verify →
  • LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)30.5 pct25.1%Verify →
  • MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)28.1 pct62.4%Verify →
  • IFBench (Artificial Analysis)19.4 pct31.5%Verify →
  • OverallNot benchmarked
  • WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Vision ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Factuality ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Search ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Document ArenaNot benchmarked
  • Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
  • GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
  • AIME (math)Not benchmarked
  • FrontierMathNot benchmarked
  • SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
  • ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
  • Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
  • SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
  • LiveBenchNot benchmarked
  • BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
  • SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
  • SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
  • Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
  • CodingNot benchmarked
  • Instruction followingNot benchmarked
  • Hard promptsNot benchmarked

Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.

  • Granite 4.0 H Small stands at 45.2 (raw mean 41.7) — measured on 4 of 27 axes.

    standingtemplateVerify →

Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →