OpenAI · model passport
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano
gpt-5-4-nano- Cloud only
- Proprietary licence
- 400,000 context
- Released 2026-10-09(first seen on LMArena)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,401#148 of 396
- Best percentile
- 99.0HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)
- Cohort standing
- 58.2median 60.7
What the data says
Benchmarked on 14 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Strongest axes
- 99 pct — HHEM Hallucination (Vectara) (96.9%)
- 93.5 pct — IFBench (Artificial Analysis) (75.9%)
Weakest axes
- 6.1 pct — SimpleQA Verified (11.7%)
Uneven: 92.9 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 99 pct on HHEM Hallucination (Vectara) versus 6.1 pct on SimpleQA Verified.
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)99 pct96.9%Verify →
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)93.5 pct75.9%Verify →
- LiveBench81.1 pct69.6%Verify →
- Coding68 pct1,460Verify →
- AIME (math)67.5 pct87.8%Verify →
- FrontierMath66.7 pct25.9%Verify →
- Hard prompts64.1 pct1,421Verify →
- Overall62.9 pct1,401Verify →
- Instruction following62.4 pct1,387Verify →
- GPQA Diamond59.3 pct78.5%Verify →
- Vision Arena45.3 pct1,199Verify →
- ARC-AGI-237.1 pct5.7%Verify →
- Factuality Arena26.7 pct1,417Verify →
- SimpleQA Verified6.1 pct11.7%Verify →
- WebDev ArenaNot benchmarked
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Document ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Use it hosted
openai/gpt-5.4-nanoAPI parameters this endpoint supports
Example request
curl https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"openai/gpt-5.4-nano","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Hello"}]}'Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
gpt-5.4-nano-high stands at 58.2 (raw mean 60) — measured on 14 of 27 axes.
gpt-5.4-nano-high stands at 58.2 versus a cohort median of 60.7 across 171 models released within 180 days — below the peer median.
gpt-5.4-nano-high scores in the 99th percentile on HHEM Hallucination (Vectara).
gpt-5.4-nano-high scores at percentile 93.5 on IFBench (Artificial Analysis).
gpt-5.4-nano-high scores at percentile 6.1 on SimpleQA Verified.
gpt-5.4-nano-high shows a 93-point percentile gap across 14 covered axes: 99 on HHEM Hallucination (Vectara) versus 6.1 on SimpleQA Verified.
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →