Google · model passport
Gemma 4 31b
gemma-4-31b- Open weights
- Apache 2.0 licence
- 32.7B params
- Released 2026-03-12(HF repo created)
- Overall · LMArena
- 1,452#67 of 396
- Best percentile
- 92.0IFBench (Artificial Analysis)
- Cohort standing
- 64.9median 57.2
What the data says
Benchmarked on 9 of 27 tracked axes. Every figure below is the model's own published result on that board.
Strongest axes
- 92 pct — IFBench (Artificial Analysis) (75.6%)
- 87.4 pct — Instruction following (1,454)
Uneven: 65.7 percentile points between its best and worst axis — 92 pct on IFBench (Artificial Analysis) versus 26.3 pct on Document Arena.
- IFBench (Artificial Analysis)92 pct75.6%Verify →
- Instruction following87.4 pct1,454Verify →
- Hard prompts84.3 pct1,476Verify →
- Coding83.9 pct1,502Verify →
- Overall83.3 pct1,452Verify →
- Vision Arena76 pct1,262Verify →
- Factuality Arena65.1 pct1,449Verify →
- WebDev Arena30.2 pct1,368Verify →
- Document Arena26.3 pct1,445Verify →
- Search ArenaNot benchmarked
- Agent ArenaNot benchmarked
- GPQA DiamondNot benchmarked
- AIME (math)Not benchmarked
- FrontierMathNot benchmarked
- SimpleQA VerifiedNot benchmarked
- ARC-AGI-2Not benchmarked
- Humanity's Last ExamNot benchmarked
- SimpleBenchNot benchmarked
- LiveBenchNot benchmarked
- BFCL v4 (function calling)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench Verified (live board)Not benchmarked
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Not benchmarked
- MMLU-Pro (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis)Not benchmarked
- HHEM Hallucination (Vectara)Not benchmarked
- SWE-bench VerifiedNot benchmarked
- Terminal-BenchNot benchmarked
Percentiles are the model's standing within each board's own population. Axes marked "not benchmarked" have no published result for this model — that is an absence of data, not a low score.
How to run it
Run it yourself
Transformers
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
model_id = "google/gemma-4-31B"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id)Ollama
We don't sync Ollama tags, so we won't print a command we can't verify — a wrong one would pull the wrong model. Search the Ollama library →
Unsloth fine-tuning recipes are model-specific and we don't derive them here. Unsloth docs →
Identifiers, limits and prices are synced from the upstream source shown above. Any field we haven't synced is left out entirely rather than guessed.
gemma-4-31b stands at 64.9 (raw mean 69.8) — measured on 9 of 27 axes.
gemma-4-31b stands at 64.9 versus a cohort median of 57.2 across 101 models released within 180 days — above the peer median.
gemma-4-31b scores in the 92nd percentile on IFBench (Artificial Analysis).
gemma-4-31b scores at percentile 87.4 on Instruction following.
gemma-4-31b ranks between #63 and #214 across 6 built-in weightings — best under "Conversation-first", worst under "Coding-focused".
Every claim is a computed fact from the current board data, phrased by a low-temperature model call and rejected by a validation gate if any number is not in the source row. How the leaderboards work →